Started By
Message
locked post

GOP blogger on the missing story of the election

Posted on 11/18/14 at 5:17 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98381 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 5:17 am
quote:

Few things are as dangerous to a long term strategy as a short-term victory. Republicans this week scored the kind of win that sets one up for spectacular, catastrophic failure and no one is talking about it.

What emerges from the numbers is the continuation of a trend that has been in place for almost two decades. Once again, Republicans are disappearing from the competitive landscape at the national level across the most heavily populated sections of the country while intensifying their hold on a declining electoral bloc of aging, white, rural voters. The 2014 election not only continued that doomed pattern, it doubled down on it. As a result, it became apparent from the numbers last week that no Republican candidate has a credible shot at the White House in 2016, and the chance of the GOP holding the Senate for longer than two years is precisely zero.

For Republicans looking for ways that the party can once again take the lead in building a nationally relevant governing agenda, the 2014 election is a prelude to a disaster. Understanding this trend begins with a stark graphic.

Behold the Blue Wall:



The Blue Wall is block of states that no Republican Presidential candidate can realistically hope to win. Tuesday that block finally extended to New Hampshire, meaning that at the outset of any Presidential campaign, a minimally effective Democratic candidate can expect to win 257 electoral votes without even trying. That’s 257 out of the 270 needed to win.

Arguably Virginia now sits behind that wall as well. Democrats won the Senate seat there without campaigning in a year when hardly anyone but Republicans showed up to vote and the GOP enjoyed its largest wave in modern history. Virginia would take that tally to 270. Again, that’s 270 out of 270.

This means that the next Presidential election, and all subsequent ones until a future party realignment, will be decided in the Democratic primary. Only by sweeping all nine of the states that remain in contention AND also flipping one impossibly Democratic state can a Republican candidate win the White House. What are the odds that a Republican candidate capable of passing muster with 2016 GOP primary voters can accomplish that feat? You do the math.

By contrast, Republicans control a far more modest Red Fortress, which currently amounts to 149 electoral votes. What happened to that fortress amid the glory of the 2014 “victory?” It shrunk yet again. Not only are New Hampshire and probably Virginia now off the competitive map, Georgia is now clearly in play at the Federal level. This trend did not start in 2014 and it will not end here. This is a long-term realignment that been in motion for more than a decade and continues to accelerate.

The biggest Republican victory in decades did not move the map. The Republican party’s geographic and demographic isolation from the rest of American actually got worse.


Much more at the LINK
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
119044 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 6:12 am to
quote:

Republicans are disappearing from the competitive landscape at the national level across the most heavily populated sections of the country while intensifying their hold on a declining electoral bloc of aging, white, rural voters.


Yet you travel to the northwest, upper Midwest, and northeast, (all blue on the map) and you see nothing but white people.

Nice of the author to interject race into his article when there is none. The red states have waaaaaaaay more non-white people than the blue states.
Posted by C
Houston
Member since Dec 2007
27832 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 6:54 am to
Problem is the story misses the governorships that were picked up behind the blue wall and in Illinois. Republicans now hold 33 states. That creates a huge bench for republicans to choose a quality executive from. Also a very diverse group.
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48745 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 7:15 am to
Whatever helps y'all sleep at night. It was only a matter of time until an outright defeat was turned into a moral victory for the libs.
Posted by CajunAlum Tiger Fan
The Great State of Louisiana
Member since Jan 2008
7880 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:12 am to
This is why the electoral college no longer works as intended. A handful of states decide the election and voters in strong red or blue States see the polls and don't vote because their votes don't matter, so even the popular vote is inaccurate.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:38 am to
I am certainly not a political expert, but I get the impression that many moderate dems are leaving the reservation. The dem party has become a group of small special interest groups, which include minorities, LGBT crowd and environmentalists. The leadership has become to liberal for even the moderate dems.

Just look at the election results from Oregon a couple of weeks ago. They passed a "legalize pot" measure with 64%, but they defeated a "drivers license for illegals" with 66%. They also defeated a "secondary education funding". The measure would have created a fund for Oregonians pursuing post-secondary education and authorized the financing of this fund via debt.

Even though Oregon is pretty liberal they are still capable of voting for conservative issues.
Posted by KeyserSoze999
Member since Dec 2009
10608 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 8:54 am to
quote:

and the chance of the GOP holding the Senate for longer than two years is precisely zero.


and then he woke up, the blanket was all wet and gooey and his belly felt a wet warmth ...
Posted by FT
REDACTED
Member since Oct 2003
26925 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:47 pm to
Republicans done; It's Over
Posted by a want
I love everybody
Member since Oct 2010
19756 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 3:57 pm to
Good post. Thanks for the link.

quote:

The 2014 election not only continued that doomed pattern, it doubled down on it. As a result, it became apparent from the numbers last week that no Republican candidate has a credible shot at the White House in 2016, and the chance of the GOP holding the Senate for longer than two years is precisely zero.

...

The Blue Wall is block of states that no Republican Presidential candidate can realistically hope to win. Tuesday that block finally extended to New Hampshire, meaning that at the outset of any Presidential campaign, a minimally effective Democratic candidate can expect to win 257 electoral votes without even trying. That’s 257 out of the 270 needed to win.



And Immigration will be the coup de grace.

GOP candidates will be forced to take a position ( an unfavorabile one) :
* anti-immigration = you might win nomination but you just lost the general
* pro-immigration = you just lost the nomination.

Dumb asses

I heard on XM-Sirius POTUS this weekend that if current racial voting trends hold, GOP will have to win 65% of the white vote. They won roughly 55% and 59% for McCain and Romney ...so...yeah....that's almost certainly not happening.

If the Ds win Ohio, Virginia or Florida it's over. The Senate races will be the only ones of interest.
This post was edited on 11/18/14 at 3:59 pm
Posted by texashorn
Member since May 2008
13122 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 4:07 pm to
quote:

declining electoral bloc of aging, white, rural voters


I tend to believe that white women and younger whites will begin fleeing the Democratic Party once their agenda of open borders, a shitty economy and the continued evisceration of the middle class comes more into focus.

Mrs. Wendy Davis (I know, it's Texas) was a big turnoff to suburban white women.

So in the future, we'll have Democrats (homosexuals, miscreants and minorities) and Republicans (whites). No more of this soccer mom shite turning the tide for Democrats.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

The Blue Wall is block of states that no Republican Presidential candidate can realistically hope to win. Tuesday that block finally extended to New Hampshire, meaning that at the outset of any Presidential campaign, a minimally effective Democratic candidate can expect to win 257 electoral votes without even trying. That’s 257 out of the 270 needed to win.
This is a contradictory post. He talks about how Senate results can't be extrapolated to make conclusions about Presidential races and then pronounces New Hampshire as safe Blue forever because a popular incumbent (Shaheen) beat the tide.

CO and NH are listed as "safe" here despite going for Obama by 5%... 1% more than the national popular vote. Is it suddenly impossible for Reps to win the popular vote by more than 1%? Or to make up the difference with a better ground game?

Plus, how are CO and NH safe at +5, and with flips this century, while AZ and WV are swing states at -12 and -27? WV had a higher margin for Romney than AL!
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram