- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Taking in foreign Ebola patients...
Posted on 10/30/14 at 10:17 am to mmcgrath
Posted on 10/30/14 at 10:17 am to mmcgrath
quote:
1. 30 at a time
Why only 30? More than that are dying in Africa at a time. Why not 100? 1000?
quote:
2. Early diagnosed victims reporting to one of US Army built treatment centers.
But we will accept ALL Africans with Ebola, correct?
quote:
2a. Doctors at treatment centers using guidelines (how sick, age, general health).
Who sets those guidelines? The CDC? Their track record has been pretty terrible as of late, in regards to Ebola.
quote:
3. We do.
Why are we responsible, financially, for all disease victims in AFrica? Better yet, why are we stopping at Ebola? Surely africans are dying of other diseases. And why are we just stopping at diseases? Why aren't we feeding and clothing ALL AFRICANS? Seems pretty callous that only Ebola victims get preferential treatment. And why only Africa? Why aren't we solving the ENTIRE WORLD'S problems at our expense?
quote:
4. Zero. We have NIH and CDC doctors along with volunteer doctors like Doctors Without Borders. What is better for the volunteers is that they work in a very controlled environment in the US as opposed to West Africa so volunteers are more available.
Wait, so we hold zero liability when the administration mandates we treat foreign diseased individuals, and our healthcare workers are infected? That is not living in the real world. You know, for a fact, that we will be liable to treat our own. But you say we don't have to? So we must treat foreigners and ignore our own citizens? Great thinking chief.
quote:
5. Zero. We don't forcibly quarantine doctors who work in the US even if they work with infectious diseases.
And if they spread the disease to other people? Just let them go about too? ARe you really that stupid? You are advocating we accept and quarantine, at the taxpayers expense, every human in Africa with Ebola, yet you don't want us to treat our own population, and you are advocating the countrywide spread of Ebola, because you are afraid of inconveniencing someone?
quote:
mmcgrath
I would like your response to my counterpoints. Something tells me you won't give it, though.
Posted on 10/30/14 at 10:22 am to BugAC
quote:Why should I offer counter points to someone who is intentionally misinterpreting half of what I write? Why don't you just offer your own views backed up by reasoning? That should be a hoot.
I would like your response to my counterpoints. Something tells me you won't give it, though.
Case in point:
quote:Absolutely NOT what I wrote.
And if they spread the disease to other people? Just let them go about too? ARe you really that stupid? You are advocating we accept and quarantine, at the taxpayers expense, every human in Africa with Ebola, yet you don't want us to treat our own population, and you are advocating the countrywide spread of Ebola, because you are afraid of inconveniencing someone?
This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 10:23 am
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)