Started By
Message

re: A Featured RB

Posted on 10/27/14 at 3:46 pm to
Posted by htran90
BC
Member since Dec 2012
30160 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

For the sake of debate, I'm busting all the Ingram lovers balls over semantics. Both are quality backs.



Which have been refuted with clear cut stats every way you tried to spin it.

quote:

Reality is Mark is finally turning into a good back from the end of the season continuing into this year. He's not consistent enough to be a feature back, imo. The Saints need a Robinson for the next game when Ingram decides to rush for 16 yards against a good defense.



Robinson hasn't shown much consistency at all in his 2 years here either.
Last year: 38, 37, 9, 53, 9, 4, 6, 0, 18, 50, 45, 57
This year: 28, 31, 69, 87, 89, 26
If it wasn't for one run in dallas game, it'd be closer to 30 and not 87 as well.

quote:

I do really believe Robinson has more acceleration in the hole, similar to Doug Martin, thus I think Robinson would be, in the long run, the better back for this offense, especially with Lorig in the lineup. But that's JMO.


Similar to Doug Martin, who has done nothing since year 1. Mr. Muscle Hamster is also on the trading block.

quote:

Either way, I think we have a good backfield, if we can stay healthy. I personally can't count on Ingram consistently having "good games" so I wish Robinson would get healthy soon.



Robinson doesn't have many "good games" either. You say 50+ yards is a good game. See posts above with the %. 6/18 games 50+ yards for Khiry, 17/43 games 50+ yards for Ingram.

39.5% of the games > 33.3% of the games

What's your next argument on Khiry is better?
Posted by bamabenny
Member since Nov 2009
14661 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 3:48 pm to
In before "because Parcells said so"
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14809 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

What's your next argument on Khiry is better?


Because Parcells said so.


EDIT: shite!
Posted by LSUFreek
Greater New Orleans
Member since Jan 2007
14809 posts
Posted on 10/27/14 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

Which have been refuted with clear cut stats every way you tried to spin it.


Refuted as in Robinson is now not a quality back?

Now, you're the one trolling.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram