Started By
Message

re: Texas Atty Gen and U of Houston law professor agree: City of Houston overreached

Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:37 pm to
Posted by Roger Klarvin
DFW
Member since Nov 2012
46556 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 5:37 pm to
The pastors ended up not being involved in the lawsuit, and thus the subpoena was promptly bitch-slapped. That's pretty much what most said would happen.

This ruling isn't saying the subpoena would have been thrown out regardless of the involvement of the pastors and churches in the suit. Had they been, the subpoena would have been perfectly legal. This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 5:38 pm
Posted by lsuroadie
South LA
Member since Oct 2007
8401 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 6:07 pm to
quote:

This isn't some unilateral declaration that churches are free from legal precedent like some here were claiming.
we have the Constitution for that....right?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48672 posts
Posted on 10/17/14 at 7:02 pm to
I think you have the discovery rules confused. How would 1st amendment rights change and sermons be discoverable even if the pastors were part of the suit?
This post was edited on 10/17/14 at 7:06 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram