- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Updated CEO pay OP: CEOs earn 3.8 times average worker
Posted on 10/2/14 at 5:40 pm to Willie Stroker
Posted on 10/2/14 at 5:40 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
What makes you think some pay disparity ratio is meaningful other than as an economic policy propaganda tool to advocate for some lofty notion of the way things ought to be?
I'm just asking if the one we see now seems appropriate given the relative value of each.
I'm also curious about what the popular perception of that ratio is.
Aside, I'm a bit curious about what it means when I see posts like "I have no opinion on the question because the question is stupid." Does that mean "yes the ratio we see is appropriate" or "any ratio would be appropriate"?
1
Posted on 10/2/14 at 5:51 pm to 90proofprofessional
The ratio will fluctuate relative to the success of the business model, no?
So the answer is yes. Whatever the ratio is at a given corporation, then that ratio is ok. If the ratio fluctuates over time, that's ok too.
So the answer is yes. Whatever the ratio is at a given corporation, then that ratio is ok. If the ratio fluctuates over time, that's ok too.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News