- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sandy hook -- has anyone ever seen pictures of this crime ?
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:12 pm to LSURussian
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:12 pm to LSURussian
quote:
For one thing more high school kids carry cell phones with cameras than do elementary students.
Are you implying that high school kids had cell phones in 1999?
3
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:14 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:I'm not implying it I'm saying more high school kids carry cell phones than elementary kids. The videos I've seen of Columbine were of the cell phone variety.
Are you implying that high school kids had cell phones in 1999?
ETA: And I just looked it up. Cell phones with cameras began wide spread consumer sales in the early 1990's.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 2:17 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:15 pm to 1DuckyBoy
well you must be a real fricking weirdo/technically retarded
1. conspiracies are bullshite (ironic coming from me I know) because they never succeed. No such thing as a successful conspiracy involving more than 2 people when it concerns something people care about. a conspiracy to cover up the stealing of ketchup would work. One to kill JFK, not so much? I guess I'm talking conspiracy in conjunction with coverup.
2. why do you want to look at dead kids? It is irrefutable what happened and well documented...I guess adam lanza's father was in on it! Or all of the witnesses, or the parents who say their kids are dead, or all the investigators who..aah frick it
3.
1. conspiracies are bullshite (ironic coming from me I know) because they never succeed. No such thing as a successful conspiracy involving more than 2 people when it concerns something people care about. a conspiracy to cover up the stealing of ketchup would work. One to kill JFK, not so much? I guess I'm talking conspiracy in conjunction with coverup.
2. why do you want to look at dead kids? It is irrefutable what happened and well documented...I guess adam lanza's father was in on it! Or all of the witnesses, or the parents who say their kids are dead, or all the investigators who..aah frick it
3.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 2:26 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:21 pm to LSURussian
quote:
quote:
I think I have seen video from the schools security cameras of the hallways, library and maybe cafeteria.
Yeah, so?
This my question....why can the columbine video be available but not the kid going through the front @ sandy hook? its not a conspiracy question but rather a general interest
ETA: This isn't cell phone video
LINK
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 2:23 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:23 pm to TK421
quote:Link?
Sand Hook hoax website
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:27 pm to FT
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:29 pm to LSURussian
quote:Not that it matters, but no they weren't.
The videos I've seen of Columbine were of the cell phone variety.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:29 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
Are you implying that high school kids had cell phones in 1999?
PLenty of HS kids had cell phones in 99, but I don't think video cameras were very common.
This post was edited on 9/25/14 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:30 pm to slapahoe
quote:
ETA: This isn't cell phone video
LINK
That's also from the movie Zero Day, which was inspired by the events of Columbine. A little bit of research can go a long way.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:34 pm to 1DuckyBoy
The conspiracy types go way, way too far with Sandy Hook but there were some very goofy things about it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:42 pm to LSURussian
quote:
ETA: And I just looked it up. Cell phones with cameras began wide spread consumer sales in the early 1990's.
You're off by a decade.
LINK
Posted on 9/25/14 at 2:49 pm to 1DuckyBoy
Smiling, laughing, happy faces of all the family...
That's what we saw.
On TV.
And the alleged perp - is an old teenage photo of the "supposed brother" as an adult.
They are all old photos.
This thing has been covered so extensively to prove the false flag...there are so many sources out there revealing the dog and pony show of that day - and documentaries on youtube - it's beyond ridiculous people still believe something happened that day beyond a circus, drill, and media manipulation.
Smiling happy faces everywhere, smiling happy faces everywhere...REM
No tears...just the Obama tear (wipe away something that isn't there.)
That's what we saw.
On TV.
And the alleged perp - is an old teenage photo of the "supposed brother" as an adult.
They are all old photos.
This thing has been covered so extensively to prove the false flag...there are so many sources out there revealing the dog and pony show of that day - and documentaries on youtube - it's beyond ridiculous people still believe something happened that day beyond a circus, drill, and media manipulation.
Smiling happy faces everywhere, smiling happy faces everywhere...REM
No tears...just the Obama tear (wipe away something that isn't there.)
Posted on 9/25/14 at 3:03 pm to Zamoro10
quote:Ok. Yeah. You're just inconceivably stupid.
Zamoro10
Posted on 9/25/14 at 3:07 pm to RidiculousHype
In 2002, technology made another huge change in the history of mobile phones, putting a great full colour display and integrating camera to mobile phones, producing the world’s first camera cell phone................2002 to 2003 
Posted on 9/25/14 at 3:10 pm to FT
What I think is scary is that people that weren't there, have no proof that it happened other than what the media told them will not only overlook extremely peculiar aspects about the case but will ridicule anyone willing to just ask questions about it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 3:30 pm to bamafan1001
quote:Ok.
What I think is scary is that people that weren't there, have no proof that it happened other than what the media told them will not only overlook extremely peculiar aspects about the case but will ridicule anyone willing to just ask questions about it.
Posted on 9/25/14 at 4:22 pm to 1DuckyBoy
quote:
just show the guy in the school . is that too much to ask
Ok, so let's say video comes out that shows grainy footage of guy with gun walking through school. Then all of the sudden all the conspiracy theorists will pause and say, "Well I'll be darned. There he is on the video. It must be true!" As if it were easier to fake all the panic and terror and sobbing interviews than it is to fake a guy walking on camera
You are beyond deluded
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:32 pm to FT
quote:
quote:
What I think is scary is that people that weren't there, have no proof that it happened other than what the media told them will not only overlook extremely peculiar aspects about the case but will ridicule anyone willing to just ask questions about it.
Ok.
Dude whats your deal? Are you a troll? You troll the OT board with your obviously made up ghost pictures? I wish trolls would stick to SECr and OT board
Posted on 9/25/14 at 5:37 pm to bamafan1001
quote:I'm awesome.
Dude whats your deal?
quote:Sometimes.
Are you a troll?
quote:I just can't believe someone who wasn't there and has no proof of what happened is willing to ridicule me.
You troll the OT board with your obviously made up ghost pictures?
quote:I don't care.
I wish trolls would stick to SECr and OT board
Posted on 9/26/14 at 12:54 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
No. They haven't released them because nobody wants to see a bunch of children who've been blown to bits.
Except you, you sick frick.
Pictures of the crime scene without the bodies or video footage of the evacuation is probably what conspirators seek.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News