- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would you Veto this trade?
Posted on 9/20/14 at 8:19 am to lsuhunt555
Posted on 9/20/14 at 8:19 am to lsuhunt555
quote:Peyton Manning, DT88 and Bernard for Tolbert?
Your opinion doesn't fricking matter. You don't veto trades that don't involve kickers or defense.
1
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:40 am to drake20
quote:
in one of my leagues today, Brees and Pitta for Brady and Gronk got vetoed...it was sad
That's one of the fairest trades I've seen.
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:51 am to WicKed WayZ
No reason to veto if it helps out both teams. Don't penalize the guy for having a good draft and having the depth to make fair trades. Vetoes should only occur if the trade is completely lop-sided and obviously only helping one team. This is simply not the case here.
Posted on 9/20/14 at 9:56 am to WicKed WayZ
9 outta 10 times people just veto because they are jealous because their team sucks and if they don't have the depth to make trades to make their team better then they don't want anyone else making trades either.
Posted on 9/20/14 at 11:19 am to Thias2685
I'm only jealous because my trade got vetoed so frick it
Posted on 9/20/14 at 11:23 am to boom roasted
Do you understand the word collusion? If a trade is obviously collusion or involves a kicker or defense it is veto able. If not stop being pussy.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News