Started By
Message

re: why is it called a pro set offense?

Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:02 pm to
Posted by timlan2057
In the Shadow of Tiger Stadium
Member since Sep 2005
17021 posts
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:02 pm to


This is indeed the classic pro set. It got its name in the late 50's, when most teams adopted it. The New York Giants were the last team to mostly use the old tight T-formation.

The second WR is the "flanker back." He is a back, so must lineup a step off the LOS.

Throughout the sixties and mid-seventies, the "fullback" ran the ball as much or sometimes more than the halfback or "tailback." Teams either lined the backs up as illustrated, or used an I formation.

Notable fullback-halfback pairings where the fullback carried as much as the half included Don Perkins and Dan Reeves of the Cowboys, Dick Bass and Willie Ellison of the Rams, and of course, Jim Taylor and Paul Hornung of the Packers.

Teams stayed in the pro-set most of the time because during the 60s and 70s, the active roster for an NFL team was 40 players, not 53 like today. Formation evolution was limited because you could not carry 7 WR's on the roster to come out with these 5 wideout sets, etc. The same thing was true for defense, but that's another story.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16036 posts
Posted on 9/14/14 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

timlan2057


good analysis. What years did pro teams mainly line up with two TE's and the RB's in an I formation with 1 wr and with the o-line packed in tight and run mainly off tackle plays and inside pitch plays into defenses with 9 in the box as a regular practice on 1st and 10, and 2nd and 10? Also would doing this be called a pro-set or a pro-style offense as there seems to be some confusion on this point?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram