Started By
Message

re: Who thinks that the south benefited by secession?

Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:15 pm to
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:15 pm to
You suspect
Posted by LSUTigersVCURams
Member since Jul 2014
21940 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:18 pm to
quote:

these "holier than thou" Yankees


Nothing god damn worse than a yankee who thinks he knows something
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55486 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:22 pm to
HHtM isn't even a Yankee, he should know better.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69306 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:38 pm to
It is what it is. The south in the antebellum years was populated mostly by slaves and impoverished whites ho did not own shoes.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55486 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

The south in the antebellum years was populated mostly by slaves and impoverished whites ho did not own shoes.


Do you have any source for the lack of shoes?
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 9/12/14 at 11:40 pm to
quote:

illiterate oppressed people
actually literacy was surprisingly good
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:00 am to
quote:

I stand by my assertion that most southern whites were barefoot, illiterate oppressed people who were little economically better than modern day Ethiopians.


I think you fail to understand the cultural dynamics of Anglo America before the war and the large Irish and German migration in the 1840s.

In the 1630s about 20,000 Puritans came to America and settled in New England, this group was what we would consider middle class, they purposely excluded both the rich and the poor. They are your typical Yankee. They valued education perhaps more then any group and were highly literate.

In the 1650s to 1660s about 45,000 Anglican Cavaliers and their laborers and servants came to Virginia. They also valued literacy and even the laborers and servants in later generations tried to emulate the wealthy.

In the 1680s to 1710s about 23,000 Quakers and German Pietists settled in the Delaware Valley they also valued literacy to a great extent.

Finally and most importantly between 1720 to 1770 about 250,000 typically known as the Scotch Irish settled in America in what was known as the Backcountry or Appalachia from Pennsylvania to Georgia. While not known for their high level of literacy initially compared to the other Anglo groups, many families were already quite literate or became learned and quite upwardly mobile. These men formed the greatest part of both the Union and Confederate Armies excepting the new Irish immigrants.

Posted by cave canem
pullarius dominus
Member since Oct 2012
12186 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:05 am to
quote:

I think you fail to understand the cultural dynamics of Anglo America before the war and the large Irish and German migration in the 1840s



He does not care he is just stirring shite to see who takes the bait
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55486 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:06 am to
quote:

In the 1650s to 1660s about 45,000 Anglican Cavaliers and their laborers and servants came to Virginia.


Muh peoples.

Unfortunately, their descendants (and my ancestors) fled to the Alabama territory in the 1790's due to being British loyalists during the war.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
69306 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:15 am to
quote:

Puritans
My folks.

For the record, I am NOT attacking the south. I am attacking the southern families who didn't allow the lower classes to advance.
Posted by socraticsilence
Member since Dec 2013
1347 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:38 am to
Edearl ,


You and Hail can both be right you realize-- I mean a place can have a ton of poverty and also be extraordinarily wealthy if said wealth is concentrated as it was in the antebellum South in the hands of a relatively few sociopathic autocrats.
Posted by OleWar
Troy H. Middleton Library
Member since Mar 2008
5828 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:45 am to
Opinions did vary over time amongst Virginia governors.

"I thank God, there are no free schools nor printing, and I hope we shall not have these for a hundred years; for learning has brought disobedience, and heresy, and sects into the world, and printing has divulged them, and libels against the best government. God keep us from both!" William Berkeley 1671

"I... [proposed] three distinct grades of education, reaching all classes. 1. Elementary schools for all children generally, rich and poor. 2. Colleges for a middle degree of instruction, calculated for the common purposes of life and such as should be desirable for all who were in easy circumstances. And 3d. an ultimate grade for teaching the sciences generally and in their highest degree... The expenses of [the elementary] schools should be borne by the inhabitants of the county, every one in proportion to his general tax-rate. This would throw on wealth the education of the poor." Thomas Jefferson 1821
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68279 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:47 am to
quote:

Most historians agree that these folks were among the poorest people to ever inhabit the globe.


I suspect that is untrue as well.
Posted by GeorgeWest
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2013
13085 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 1:00 am to
The 15 states that allowed slavery in 1860 had a class (free persons) structure as follows:

PLantation Aristocracy (4%)---owned largest and most productive plantations and generally owned 20+ slaves. These are the people who ran the Antebellum South.

Small Planters (4%)---smaller, less productive plantation owners with 5-15 slaves. These people worshiped the Aristocracy and aspired to be in that group. Very few made it after 1800.

Business and Professional classes (2%)--very small class centered in cities like New Orleans and Charleston. The backwardness of the Antebellum Southern economy is indicated by the samall size of this class.

Yeoman Class (40%)---small, independent landowning farmers. FYI, most Confederate soldiers come form this class. Almost none of these people owned slaves although some might own one slave.

PWT, Piney Woods folks, Dirt eaters, Rednecks, etc (40%)----lived in red dirt, hilly or mountaianous South kind of off the griid in many cases. Very little is known about this culture compared to the rest of the South.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 1:31 am to
pretty stupid one way or another to continue to argue about shite that nobody alive remembers

Racial disparity continues to be supported by a disparity in talent, specifically intellectual capacity.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55486 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 1:35 am to
quote:

Racial disparity continues to be supported by a disparity in talent, specifically intellectual capacity.


I guess that's why African immigrants tend to be more successful and obtain greater education than the general white population.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67954 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 5:42 am to
quote:

VanCleef


sorry I missed you

I guess you're banned already
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
21598 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 5:45 am to
Imagine if the plantation owners would have paid people to work their land instead of buying slaves.

Imagine if the war had been fought with volunteers only and no draftees.
Posted by bencoleman
RIP 7/19
Member since Feb 2009
37887 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 8:46 am to
quote:

illiterate





I would imagine literary rates were higher back then than they are now
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 8:47 am to
Well, we got our arse kicked, so no.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram