- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How would arming rebels in Syria have stopped ISIS?
Posted on 9/11/14 at 4:33 pm to mmcgrath
Posted on 9/11/14 at 4:33 pm to mmcgrath
McCain's strongest point is that Obama's precipitate withdrawal from Iraq created the opportunity for ISIL to rise in Iraq.
Do you dispute that, had US military forces remained in Iraq, ISIL would not have conquered most of Iraq?
McCain's weaker point is that arming some rebel faction in Syria would have destroyed ISIL. But, how can you logically bash McCain alone for this idea when Obama just last night said that the USA was going to plan to arm some rebel faction in Syria ?
Do you dispute that, had US military forces remained in Iraq, ISIL would not have conquered most of Iraq?
McCain's weaker point is that arming some rebel faction in Syria would have destroyed ISIL. But, how can you logically bash McCain alone for this idea when Obama just last night said that the USA was going to plan to arm some rebel faction in Syria ?
This post was edited on 9/11/14 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 9/11/14 at 5:50 pm to Champagne
quote:Depends on the number. McCain seemed to be saying that it was possible to leave 3K. And it would have been a group for advising and training, not really boots on the ground. I think such a small force would have been an attractive target for ISIS.
Do you dispute that, had US military forces remained in Iraq, ISIL would not have conquered most of Iraq?
It would be McCain's stronger point, but I am not completely sold on it... I think that we would have needed a larger force including "boots" and that would have been costly in so many ways.
quote:That is the one part of Obama's new plan that I am not in agreement with. I don't think it was the best idea a few years ago, and I don't think it is today either.
McCain's weaker point is that arming some rebel faction in Syria would have destroyed ISIL. But, how can you logically bash McCain alone for this idea when Obama just last night said that the USA was going to plan to arm some rebel faction in Syria ?
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News