Started By
Message

re: DNC Responds to Paul's WSJ Article

Posted on 8/28/14 at 3:02 pm to
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Idiots. They think they must attack him because he has an R by his name and they don't realize how dumb and hypocritical they sound now. They'll isolate a lot of their base with that hawkish tone.

Well said. If a Democrat was going to vote for a hawk, why not just vote for McCain, because you know he's the real thing.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:00 pm to
Those fat hacks have no idea how hypocrital they sound right now. They have an epic tin ear going on right now.
This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 4:27 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

“Simply put, if Rand Paul had a foreign policy slogan, it would be – The Rand Paul Doctrine: Blame America. Retreat from the World.”
Perfect. If that is the battlefield, Paul wins.

It's Alinsky 101 -- Assign your faults to others.
I really don't see Rand making it to the general election unfortunately, but if he did, he'd eat that yarn up.
Posted by Godfather1
What WAS St George, Louisiana
Member since Oct 2006
79733 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

It was never a plank in the party platform,


Tsk, tsk.

Facts. You'll confuse him.
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

criticized American policy to the president of another country on foreign soil. This week he’s blaming the Obama Administration for another nation’s civil war. That type of “blame America” rhetoric may win Paul accolades at a conference of isolationists but it does nothing to improve our standing in the world. In fact, Paul’s proposals would make America less safe and less secure.
Obama 2.0
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

Obama 2.0


So much truth.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34715 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

Rand Paul Doctrine: Blame America



Wait, is Rand Paul running as a Democrat?
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64384 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:30 pm to
quote:

Hell he stole obamacare from the right. BOOM


Its a cute saying and all and repeating something over and over again doesn't make it more factual.

Mitt and Massachusetts are not "right".
Posted by Alabama Slim
2009,2011 BCS National Champions
Member since Jul 2007
9942 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

That type of “blame America” rhetoric may win Paul accolades at a conference of isolationists but it does nothing to improve our standing in the world. In fact, Paul’s proposals would make America less safe and less secure.


holy crap he's doing it, turning dems into hawkish republicans.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90706 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Hell he stole obamacare from the right. BOOM. Shitty idea.


No he didn't. Republicans have never supported nationalized healthcare.

Just because one "conservative" think tank proposed it as an idea doesn't mean those on the right or the Republican party supported it.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
90706 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:09 pm to
quote:

Obama 2.0


A main different in Paul and Obama is Paul has better leadership capabilities and I fully trust him to be more successful with diplomacy....more like Reagan.

You can be non interventionist and still have a strong foreign policy. Obama just makes all of the wrong decisions..his foreign policy is atrocious.

But we don't have to arm everyone and bomb everyone to be strong in foreign affairs.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Hanging with Chicken in Lurkistan
Member since Nov 2009
120000 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

deltaland


I think the point dante is making is that these are the same arguments that were made against Obama in 2008 by the RNC. That he would blame America first (which was - in my opinion - a consistent theme of his candidacy). Seems awful self serving now that the DNC is using the same argument against Rand. He is turning their Left flank and they know it.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:34 pm to
quote:

A main different in Paul and Obama is Paul has better leadership capabilities and I fully trust him to be more successful with diplomacy....more like Reagan.

What's the basis for your opinion? Rand has no executive experience?

quote:

You can be non interventionist and still have a strong foreign policy. Obama just makes all of the wrong decisions..his foreign policy is atrocious.

ALL of the wrong decisions? Are you saying that Obama should have stayed in Iraq and attacked Syria and Iran?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35412 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:38 pm to
quote:

I have said it once and I will say it again. Anyone who voted for Lurch in 2004, but does not vote for Rand, is a huge hypocrite.
Does this go the same for people who voted for Bush in 2004 but are going hard for Rand Paul right now?
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
48439 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:47 pm to
On top of the fact that the think tank was in favor of requiring catastrophic plans. You know...the ones obamacare outlawed.

Also....the think tank changed their view on even that pretty quickly. You could say they evolved....Long before obamacare came along.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

I have said it once and I will say it again. Anyone who voted for Lurch in 2004, but does not vote for Rand, is a huge hypocrite.

I'll go a step further. Assuming Hillary and Rand get the nominations, anyone who voted for Kerry and Obama because of foreign policy is logically incoherent if they vote for Hillary. Conversely, anyone who voted for W and McCain because of foreign policy is logically incoherent if they vote for Rand.
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36696 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 8:59 pm to
do they not see the irony of their response?

but what about our global standing?!?!
Posted by John McClane
Member since Apr 2010
36696 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 9:00 pm to
well said track
Posted by dante
Kingwood, TX
Member since Mar 2006
10669 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

I think the point dante is making is that these are the same arguments that were made against Obama in 2008 by the RNC. That he would blame America first (which was - in my opinion - a consistent theme of his candidacy). Seems awful self serving now that the DNC is using the same argument against Rand. He is turning their Left flank and they know it.
thanks. That was the point.
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84876 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 10:57 pm to
quote:

The amazing thing is that this could have been a republican response to a democrat in 2004.


You mean politicans swap arguments with each other depending on who is in power????????
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram