Started By
Message

re: 2nd 'Merican killed fighting for ISIS

Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:53 am to
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:53 am to
quote:

I don't care about "due process" if we're talking Islamic jihadists. They forfeit their right to "due process" when they leave America and commit the treasonous act of joining jihadis. They are no longer American citizens at that point.


Until one renounces their American citizenship, they are still Americans entitled to due process. We cannot abandon our rights and privileges when they become inconvenient or we will have no rights when they become inconvenient for our government. He who would give up an ounce of liberty for an ounce of security deserves neither liberty nor security.
This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 11:55 am
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54753 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

We can't take the chance of killing an American citizen without affording him due process. I learned a little while back from some really smart righties that we can't just go around killing Americans who are foreign combatants engaged in warefare against the U.S. - constitution bla bla obama benghazi - they need a trial


Nice mischaracterization.
Posted by FightinTigersDammit
Louisiana North
Member since Mar 2006
34861 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Until one renounces their American citizenship, they are still Americans entitled to due process


If they are fighting against us, they should lost their citizenship.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82387 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 11:58 am to
quote:

2nd 'Merican killed fighting for ISIS

quote:
I don't care about "due process" if we're talking Islamic jihadists. They forfeit their right to "due process" when they leave America and commit the treasonous act of joining jihadis. They are no longer American citizens at that point.



Until one renounces their American citizenship, they are still Americans entitled to due process. We cannot abandon our rights and privileges when they become inconvenient or we will have no rights when they become inconvenient for our government. He who would give up an ounce of liberty for an ounce of security deserves neither liberty nor security.


Why do you draw the line there at that specific point? Why aren't you out vandalizing traffic cameras? Why are you posting on the internet where your every keystroke is being monitored? Why do you (presumably) send text messages which are illegally monitored? Why aren't you protesting the US government over the poor saps who are still being held in Guantanimo Bay in violation of the Geneva Convention?

If you are okay with the above, it's ridiculous for you to go out of your way to exempt a traitor that America knows enough about to drone.
This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 12:03 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

If they are fighting against us, they should lost their citizenship.


ISIS is not fighting against the U.S., they are fighting against the Syrian government, rival Syrian rebel groups, the Iraqi government, and the Kurds.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:00 pm to
Some great discussion here but am I the only one that noticed in the article that dude had NINE chirren?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

Why do you draw the line there at that specific point? Why aren't you out vandalizing traffic cameras? Why are you posting on the internet where your every keystroke is being monitored? Why do you (presumably) send text messages which are illegally monitored? Why aren't you protesting the poor saps who are still being held in Guantanimo Bay in violation of the Geneva Convention?

If you are okay with the above, it's ridiculous for you to go out of your way to exempt a traitor that America knows enough about to drone.


I absolutely abhor all of the above and I do not support politicians who support the above. I don't have so much issue with Guantanamo Bay prisoners who are not U.S. citizens, though.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82387 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

ISIS is not fighting against the U.S., they are fighting against the Syrian government, rival Syrian rebel groups, the Iraqi government, and the Kurds.


:link to beheading, cam phone pictures in front of white house and in chicago threatening to bomb and kill americans:

Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:02 pm to
quote:

If they are fighting against us, they should lost their citizenship.


I agree, but not until being brought to trial and found guilty of treason. This is why we have courts.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

:link to beheading, cam phone pictures in front of white house and in chicago threatening to bomb and kill americans:


Then capture those ISIS members that are Americans and try them. If there is so much evidence of their guilt, a guilty verdict and death sentence of treason is all but assured. We are Americans. Me must do things the right way, even when it's hard, because we are better than the rest of the world. We are Americans, and due process is an American right. You wouldn't want the government deciding to label you a terrorist and executing you without due process. Why should you wish such a fate on another person.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82387 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:05 pm to
quote:

I agree, but not until being brought to trial and found guilty of treason. This is why we have courts.


Nah, IMO due process needs to be a somewhat reciprocal thing. We're not talking about an entity that has agreed to any UN or Geneva protocol. I realize that by the strictest law of the land they are "protected" as "US Citizens" and maybe that needs to be amended given the rise of global terrorism... But it's easier for Obama or the current commander in chief to just exploit this gray area b/c nobody except the strictest Constitutionalists give two fricks.

This post was edited on 8/28/14 at 12:09 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

When a US citizen leaves to receive IS or Al Qaeda training, he/she is committing treason


agreed

quote:

and de-facto loses rights at that moment


disagree, I think they should lose those rights upon a guilty verdict in a court of law.
quote:

If he/she is able to come back into America than I guess that's a win for the bad guys b/c obviously they'd regain their rights.

Is it? They come back, get caught, imprisoned, tried, and executed? Sounds like a win for the good guys to me.

quote:

But if we can drone them over there they deserve absolutely zero protection or consideration.


It's easy to say that when all of our droning is against brown people in some distant, far away desert, but what if that droning becomes your state, your city, your neighborhood, your home. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."
Posted by jamboybarry
Member since Feb 2011
32673 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

When a US citizen leaves to receive IS or Al Qaeda training, he/she is committing treason and de-facto loses rights at that moment


Yeah. No.

Who gets to decide what groups your association with costs you your citizenship? Is there a trial or just a person that decides this?

Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51811 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:09 pm to
Just for sake of argument, you're saying that if Minnesota raised Habib that threatened the POTUS can be found just send a tomahawk up his arse.

What about if Johnny local KKK member made the same threat? Wouldn't he get a trail? Should he get a trial?
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82387 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

It's easy to say that when all of our droning is against brown people in some distant, far away desert, but what if that droning becomes your state, your city, your neighborhood, your home. "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you."


Then we'll all sigh and say "damnit, we should have never stood for those traffic cameras. We know that when we didn't rise up en masse to get those heinous unconstitutional Orwellian terror objects removed the moment they were installed we were on the slippery slope. And yet we did nothing."
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

Who gets to decide what groups your association with costs you your citizenship? Is there a trial or just a person that decides this?


Exactly, who's to say that attending a radical church in the U.S. isn't treason? Attending any church? Attending private school? Attending campaign rallies for political opposition? Union membership? It's a slippery slope.
Posted by SirWinston
PNW
Member since Jul 2014
82387 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:11 pm to
I'm talking strictly when they're on foreign soil in places where we have allies that we can't rely on to extradite them.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Then we'll all sigh and say "damnit, we should have never stood for those traffic cameras. We know that when we didn't rise up en masse to get those heinous unconstitutional Orwellian terror objects removed the moment they were installed we were on the slippery slope. And yet we did nothing."


Which is why I've written letters to representatives about traffic cameras, protested them, contested them in court, and supported candidates that opposed their usage on a constitutional basis. You're barking up the wrong tree here.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
67219 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 12:13 pm to
quote:

I'm talking strictly when they're on foreign soil in places where we have allies that we can't rely on to extradite them.


Then, with the permission of the recognized sovereign governmental authority, use a special ops team to abduct them, charge them, and return them to the U.S. to stand trial.
Posted by jlc05
Member since Nov 2005
32905 posts
Posted on 8/28/14 at 1:43 pm to
Defend against all enemies...foreign and domestic...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram