- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If Houston had the weather Los Angeles has would it be the largest city
Posted on 8/24/14 at 9:34 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
Posted on 8/24/14 at 9:34 pm to LSUTIGER in TEXAS
quote:
houston is barely 100 years old. All the others have 100+ years of being established. I'm not saying houston is perfect, or better than any other city. I'm saying they've come a lot further in their first 100 years than all the others, and seem to be on a meteoric rise in economy and population
You can't compare the development pace of the 1700s or 1800s to today. Plus, cities like L.A. were just tiny missions back then anyway. This is all a pointless debate. Being a huge city doesn't mean anything anyway. Case in point: Beijing.
This post was edited on 8/24/14 at 9:35 pm
0
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News