Started By
Message

re: Is not naming a starter hurting both QB's?

Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:20 am to
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
25249 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:20 am to
The problem with this is it starts from the premise that Les Miles is telling you the truth.

Here is what we know for sure: Les Miles has not publicly named the starter. Both guys have gotten reps with the first team. That's it. We don't know the split, we don't know anything else.

My suspicion is, as this goes along, the guys know who the starter is going to be based on proportion of reps. Don't let paranoid Les' public misinformation campaign warp your perception.

Also, given your name, number of posts, and avi, tigrlee alter?
Posted by LSU Groupee
Member since Oct 2012
4026 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:52 am to
quote:

Les Miles has not publicly named the starter


Anyone who hasn't yet figured out who will be starting against Wisconsin is a dummy.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28497 posts
Posted on 8/20/14 at 11:15 am to
quote:

The problem with this is it starts from the premise that Les Miles is telling you the truth.

Here is what we know for sure: Les Miles has not publicly named the starter. Both guys have gotten reps with the first team. That's it. We don't know the split, we don't know anything else.

My suspicion is, as this goes along, the guys know who the starter is going to be based on proportion of reps. Don't let paranoid Les' public misinformation campaign warp your perception.


Exactly. Les doesn't owe you or I any information. I'm sure he and his coaches can handle the QB situation as they see fit. I doubt he is concerned with my thoughts or opinions on the situation, nor should he feel that I NEED to know his.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram