- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is not naming a starter hurting both QB's?
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:11 am to ItsThatDude12
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:11 am to ItsThatDude12
Maybe not naming a starter allows them to work as hard as they can while competing for the starting job, so that they both will be ready to step in and fill that role if needed. 
2
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:13 am to LSUengineer12
this won't be settled until the middle of september IMO
Posted on 8/20/14 at 10:14 am to LSUengineer12
I understand competition is a good thing but at this point when you're preparing for Wisconsin maximizing your starters reps would pay more dividends than splitting it up.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News