Started By
Message

re: Evangelicals in Republican Party are feeling left out, see no standard-bearer

Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:21 pm to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84847 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

but I fail to see any evidence that typical evangelical issues are at the root of the Republican party's national problems.


well then, you're not looking hard enough

quote:

What libertarians are missing in all of this, I fear, is the fact that a Republican will not win the presidency without the evangelical vote. I can easily envision a situation where a hard core libertarian snags the nomination, evangelicals vote for someone else like Rick Santorum, and Warren becomes president.



suits me
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

Can't you be for one and not for the other?

no, if you smoke weed, you will be sucking on a dick for a gram of dank bud in 2-3 weeks. You will be offering up your arse for bareback penetration within 6 months.

weed, not even once.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:26 pm to
quote:

I am so pleased at the notion of having a potential Republican candidate whose platform is not predicated on pandering to evangelicals. They need to get over themselves and recognize that their religious ideals aren't the supreme tenets of the conservative movement.


Rand Paul fits that bill for the most part. Although, he's been using religious angles to pit the evangelicals against the establishment and get them in his corner just a little bit. With his broad appeal, he doesn't need a huge majority of them in a general election since he has access to voting groups that they typical republican doesn't have the luxury of sustaining a credible courtship with.
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:36 pm to
the evangelicals are a major problem that holds the right back from getting the independent voters.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

the evangelicals are a major problem that holds the right back from getting the independent voters.



Mitt Romney won the independent vote. You think he would have done even better without the evangelical vote?
This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 4:37 pm
Posted by heartbreakTiger
grinding for my grinders
Member since Jan 2008
138974 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:39 pm to
Mitt had other issues like how shitty of a campaign he ran after taking obama to the wood shed in the first debate.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

Mitt Romney won the independent vote. You think he would have done even better without the evangelical vote?


kerry won the independent vote in 2004. there is other things going on, as people get annoyed with parties and defect.

right now the republicans are 100% fricked without the evangelical vote. they wouldn't clip 35% without it.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

right now the republicans are 100% fricked without the evangelical vote. they wouldn't clip 35% without it.



Right, just like the Dems are fricked without the environmentalist vote, or the union vote, or the black vote,etc. Yet nobody is telling them they need to ditch those groups.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57200 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:52 pm to
I've said for some time that evangelicals need republicans worse than republicans need evangelicals.

Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Right, just like the Dems are fricked without the environmentalist vote, or the union vote, or the black vote,etc. Yet nobody is telling them they need to ditch those groups.

the democrats are more of a broad coalition than the republicans. the only group that dominates democrats are woman, and they aren't a bloc.

Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

I've said for some time that evangelicals need republicans worse than republicans need evangelicals.



The republicans aren't winning with evangelicals you think they are gonna win without them?
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
16918 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Rand Paul fits that bill for the most part.


That's who I'm hoping gets the nod. I'm skeptical that he'll win the nomination, but damn it, I'm hoping.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57200 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

the evangelicals are a major problem that holds the right back from getting the independent voters.
Are you' claiming that because evangelicals vote for a candidate, independents run away from that candidate because of it?

That seems like some extreme bigotry by a wide group of "independents".
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

Mitt Romney won the independent vote. You think he would have done even better without the evangelical vote?


yup
Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

The republicans aren't winning with evangelicals you think they are gonna win without them?


yup
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57200 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

The republicans aren't winning with evangelicals you think they are gonna win without them?
Maybe? I mean the evangelicals can't even elect their guys in primaries. They just don't make up as powerful of a bloc as many would like us to believe.

The "republicans are all religious zealots" is a carefully crafted caricature.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

yup



Maybe I'm just bad at math but you're gonna have to explain to me how having less people voting for you is gonna help you win.
Posted by constant cough
Lafayette
Member since Jun 2007
44788 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Maybe? I mean the evangelicals can't even elect their guys in primaries. They just don't make up as powerful of a bloc as many would like us to believe.



Yet republicans can't win without their votes since they aren't even winning with them.


quote:

The "republicans are all religious zealots" is a carefully crafted caricature.



Not really. Is about as carefully crafted as saying "democrats are all communist" which is actually closer to the truth.
Posted by Jagd Tiger
The Kinder, Gentler Jagd
Member since Mar 2014
18139 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 5:00 pm to
quote:


What portion of the democratic party is black? What is the consensus in that demographic with regards to gay marriage, for instance?

Furthermore, what percentage of the democratic party cared that Obama was against gay marriage and the legalization of drugs when he ran for president in 2008?


there are some, baptist black Dems,,, blue dog Dems, etc, but not that many left of the latter and when push comes to shove they nearly always cave and support toeing the party line.


This post was edited on 8/19/14 at 5:01 pm
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 8/19/14 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

when push comes to shove they nearly always cave and support toeing the party line.


all the blocs fall into line, at least in the last 20 years they have.

they may not show up as strongly but they eventually bow down to the inevitable.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram