- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:14 pm to Wolfhound45
Holder is a fricking embarrassment.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:43 pm to pistolpete23
Although another autopsy may yield marginally different results, if it is found that the shots were fired as he faced the officer, wouldn't terminal ballistics be the preferred science here?
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:49 pm to OneFifty
Swisher sweet blood content .10
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:50 pm to member12
quote:
They can care less about what happens in court. They want to prolong the outrage until the November elections with the hope that it generates the right turnout
Disagree
The Obamas and Holder are done with public service come 2016.
This is about aligning themselves with the right people and receiving boons for when they leave office and so they can start making Clinton level money.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:50 pm to pistolpete23
He should be required to articulate exactly what the extraordinRy circumstances are.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:51 pm to OneFifty
quote:
wouldn't terminal ballistics be the preferred science here?
Forensic Pathology
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:52 pm to Reubaltaich
quote:
If this is the case, it further destroys the narrative that the suspect was 'shot in the back.'
But it doesn't make the shooting justified.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:57 pm to pistolpete23
Depending on how this turns out... Ibsaid when Obama was running that a black president might feel compelled to take certain actions because blacks (and their champions) might expect it. That's bad, imo. This could be one of those times.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 4:58 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
But it doesn't make the shooting justified.
Nobody is claiming that it does...
But having the two key witnesses, that prosecutors would use, completely contradicted by the evidence will kill any credibility they may have had.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:08 pm to theenemy
quote:
Forensic Pathology
Thanks. I'm not well acquainted with either science. I was curious as to whether state or Feds would take lead.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:12 pm to OneFifty
quote:
Thanks. I'm not well acquainted with either science. I was curious as to whether state or Feds would take lead.
State is in the lead. Feds do their own civil rights investigation.
Typically the Feds stay out of the way and just use the states evidence once the state has concluded their investigation.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:16 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Nobody is claiming that it does...
I think some people here have picked a side and are rooting.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:26 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
I think some people here have picked a side and are rooting.
Im not rooting for anything... My views have completely 180d over the past week.
I said over and over again that I thought an initial shot from the car could be justified if Mike and him were struggling through the window, but I didn't see any way that the officer would need to fire 5-7 additional shots as he was running away.
However, the key witnesses testimony is suspect, now that he was involved in the robbery and failed to mention it, and the other girl seems to be close to Mike. Additionally, the radio interview with the friend of the officer and now the youtube video with the witness comments give credence to him shooting, Mike initially running, and then turning around to confront the officer and charging.
We shall see what other info comes out.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:43 pm to theenemy
They might as well bring in Fahmy Malak for the autopsy.
This post was edited on 8/17/14 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:48 pm to pistolpete23
And in the second autopsy they will find indisputable proof that the front of a man is now the back of a man.
And vice versa.
And vice versa.
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:54 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
Depending on how this turns out... Ibsaid when Obama was running that a black president might feel compelled to take certain actions because blacks (and their champions) might expect it. That's bad, imo
Don't forget, Brown is one of in Holder's own words, "his people".
Posted on 8/17/14 at 5:58 pm to Porky
quote:
They might as well bring in Fahmy Malak for the autopsy.
What a kook huh?
Posted on 8/17/14 at 6:01 pm to Lsut81
quote:
Mike initially running, and then turning around to confront the officer and charging.
I thought it was interesting in the robbery video he is leaving then he turns on the owner and backs the owner down.
Did he try the same thing with the officer?
Posted on 8/17/14 at 6:02 pm to theenemy
quote:
I thought it was interesting in the robbery video he is leaving then he turns on the owner and backs the owner down.
Did he try the same thing with the officer?
Interesting thought...
Page 4 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News