Started By
Message

re: What's the point of the upvote/downvote system?

Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:22 am to
Posted by RummelTiger
Texas
Member since Aug 2004
89862 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:22 am to
You forgot the third reason:

We just don't want to tell you.

It's a fricking downvote, let it go. You're acting like this truly effects your life in some significant way.
Posted by CaptainsWafer
TD Platinum Member
Member since Feb 2006
58341 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:26 am to
Downvoted
Posted by boom roasted
Member since Sep 2010
28039 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:29 am to
Burn.
Posted by Chicken
Jackassistan
Member since Aug 2003
22003 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Just to fuel clicks?
to fuel clicks? how does TD benefit from someone clicking the up or down vote?

quote:

Tell me y'all have something planned for them
still figuring it out, but any plan would have required the feature be used extensively...it has taken some time for people to get used to it...over time, there will be some good uses for it.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
85034 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:46 am to
Any utilization, whether it be user rating, thread rating, etc., would drive up use. Right now, there's not much incentive to use it other than maybe personal satisfaction.

I do find that when I skim through a thread, I'll stop to read a highly/badly voted comment.
This post was edited on 8/7/14 at 11:47 am
Posted by Hugo Stiglitz
Member since Oct 2010
72937 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:50 am to
quote:

how does TD benefit from someone clicking the up or down vote?

Well on mobile, it takes two whole new page loads to up or down vote a post. I imagine that may help some numbers, not that there's anything wrong with that...
Posted by LewDawg
Member since May 2009
75242 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 11:56 am to
Maybe something like make a reply a top reply after a certain amount of up votes. This site is very cliquish though so I don't know how that would work.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 8/7/14 at 1:35 pm to
I'm still letting it go, but I really thought they were or could be a way to gauge or poll public opinion on subjects, products, trends, etc., but the personal grudge and popularity/unpopularity of poster factors would seem to distort the results. Basically, The Rex Effect. Of course, I guess you could cancel a lot of that out in the maths.

People get banned on Reddit and elsewhere when they get enough down votes, correct? As a result, one side of the aisle has decimated the other and there is very little discourse.

Found this article on the voting herd mentality.

LINK
Posted by Spirit of Dunson
Member since Mar 2007
23111 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 1:02 am to
quote:

Alls I know is that when people don't answer such questions, it's either because they don't think others will understand the answer or that they won't like the answer.
Alls I know is when people in authority don't answer such questions it is because they don't know the answers and don't want to look stupid.
Posted by OneMoreTime
Florida Gulf Coast Fan
Member since Dec 2008
61834 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 7:05 am to
Hey brah, what you think of that idea I posted the other day?
Posted by CockHolliday
Columbia, SC
Member since Dec 2012
4516 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 10:01 am to
quote:

I like the idea of a post changing color after _____ number of upvotes.


It would also be cool to see how "well-liked" someone is based on an upvote/downvote ratio across all posts, perhaps another color scheme or some kind of status designation. I know I know, way too time-consuming but would be a cool idea.
Posted by tween the hedges
Member since Feb 2012
20245 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 1:59 pm to
quote:

Maybe something like make a reply a top reply after a certain amount of up votes. This site is very cliquish though so I don't know how that would work.

I swear I saw that once here. I don't know if they were testing but there was definitely a pinned post under the OP.
Posted by JimMorrison
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
20747 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 2:05 pm to
Admins can do it, but the top reply feature is rarely utilized.
Posted by UL-SabanRival
Member since May 2013
4651 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

It would also be cool to see how "well-liked" someone is based on an upvote/downvote ratio across all posts, perhaps another color scheme or some kind of status designation. I know I know, way too time-consuming but would be a cool idea.

It would be meaningless. People would downvote each other out of spite or just to frick with them. Everybody would end up being the same color.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 6:28 pm to
quote:

I swear I saw that once here. I don't know if they were testing but there was definitely a pinned post under the OP.


Here's another example.

LINK
Posted by JimMorrison
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
20747 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

It would be meaningless. People would downvote each other out of spite or just to frick with them.


yeah, the only way to combat that is to limit how many times you can upvote/downvote in a certain amount of time.

I'm against a karma system. it's pointless.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
117700 posts
Posted on 8/8/14 at 8:59 pm to
Admin rummy droppin the B word on that nerd meant a lot.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram