Started By
Message

re: Could the USMNT succeed playing a 352?

Posted on 8/2/14 at 8:59 pm to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 8/2/14 at 8:59 pm to
It has nothing to do with personal. Against 2 strikers often teams played with a 3 man back line to have a spare man. The reason 3 man back lines have fallen out of favor is because against a lone striker it becomes 3 v 1 at the back. That is the biggest problem in switching is that you possibly lose an advantage somewhere else on the field.
Posted by Broski
Member since Jun 2011
71241 posts
Posted on 8/2/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Against 2 strikers often teams played with a 3 man back line to have a spare man. The reason 3 man back lines have fallen out of favor is because against a lone striker it becomes 3 v 1 at the back. That is the biggest problem in switching is that you possibly lose an advantage somewhere else on the field.


But as was stated in the other thread, even though formation sheets list one striker, few teams actually play with 1 lone attacker.
Posted by DoreonthePlains
Auburn, AL
Member since Nov 2013
7436 posts
Posted on 8/3/14 at 1:45 am to
You can play a 3 man back line against lone strikers. The defenders just have to communicate well and stay connected. We also have some fairly athletic CBs (especially the younger guys), so that helps in covering.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram