Started By
Message

re: Your position on "justifiable deaths"?

Posted on 8/1/14 at 11:44 am to
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
33932 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 11:44 am to
quote:

Is it right to kill 10 if you know the result of not killing them means the certain death of 100? 500? 11?


Without a time machine you don't anything for certain.

Besides, this isn't a fricking movie so you can't punish people based on what they might do, only what they have done.
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 11:49 am to
quote:

Without a time machine you don't anything for certain.

Besides, this isn't a fricking movie so you can't punish people based on what they might do, only what they have done


That's clearly the argument for those that favor President Clinton's inaction. That, and "who gets to make that decision, that a person is so inherently bad that a government agency should just take them out."

Action is for sure a harder position to defend than inaction, absent the invention of a time machine or crystal ball.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22163 posts
Posted on 8/1/14 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

Besides, this isn't a fricking movie so you can't punish people based on what they might do, only what they have done.


bullshite. See louisiana life without parol sentence.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram