Started By
Message

re: OT Lawyers: Legal question regarding a phone and a dog!

Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:42 am to
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32888 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:42 am to
I can't find the Louisiana statute (he didn't say this occurred in Louisiana anyway) but here is the Connecticutt statute stating that the dog owner is liable:

quote:

Connecticut statute 22-357 states:

If any dog does any damage to either the body or property of any person, the owner or keeper shall be liable for such damage, except when such damage has been occasioned to the body or property of a person who, at the time such damage was sustained, was committing a trespass or other tort, or was teasing, tormenting or abusing such dog.
Posted by mattloc
Alabama
Member since Sep 2012
4320 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 8:57 am to
The owner of an animal is answerable for the damage caused by the animal. However, he is answerable for the damage only upon a showing that he knew or, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known that his animal's behavior would cause damage, that the damage could have been prevented by the exercise of reasonable care, and that he failed to exercise such reasonable care. Nonetheless, the owner of a dog is strictly liable for damages for injuries to persons or property caused by the dog and which the owner could have prevented and which did not result from the injured person's provocation of the dog. Nothing in this Article shall preclude the court from the application of the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur in an appropriate case.

Louisiana law
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18566 posts
Posted on 7/30/14 at 9:04 am to
quote:

Louisiana statute


It's Civil Code article 2321
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram