Started By
Message
locked post

More than 2500 9/11 responders have cancer

Posted on 7/29/14 at 5:58 pm
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98375 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 5:58 pm
LINK

quote:

In its latest tally, the World Trade Center Health Program at Mount Sinai Hospital counts 1,655 responders with cancer among the 37,000 cops, hard hats, sanitation workers, other city employees and volunteers it monitors, officials told The Post.

The tragic sum rises to 2,518 when firefighters and EMTs are added. The FDNY, which has its own WTC health program, said Friday it counts 863 members with cancers certified for 9/11-related treatment.
Posted by Teddy Ruxpin
Member since Oct 2006
39614 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 6:04 pm to
Sucks, but that's what happens when two 100 story buildings come down.

Is there a comparison between the average civilian and then perhaps, compared to a national baseline for first responders?
This post was edited on 7/29/14 at 6:06 pm
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
72211 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 6:05 pm to
Hmmm...

I'm curious what compounds are causing this.
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
64503 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 6:07 pm to
I don't know the % of cancer in the general pop but is 1,655 of 37,000 a much higher rate?
Posted by 4LSU2
Member since Dec 2009
37349 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 6:51 pm to
Damn that is terrible. Cancer in any form or fashion is terrible.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80251 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 7:28 pm to
1655/37000 doesn't seem like an outrageous number being that a lot of the population will get cancer.

Now if this is a specific type caused by something that can be pinpointed to the site, then that is different.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 7:31 pm to
I thought I remember hearing at one point that cement dust could cause cancer
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28526 posts
Posted on 7/29/14 at 7:49 pm to
Plaintiff's attorneys are scrambling as we speak to line up clients and figure out who to name as defendants. I assume the terrorist weren't insured, so where does that leave us? United Airlines? The building contractors? Material manufacturers? Surely it was foreseeable that foreign terrorist could hijack to planes and fly them in to buildings, right?

I only wish this thought was outlandish as it sounds
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram