- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 4th Circuit Court of Appeals strikes down Virginia's Gay Marriage Ban
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:39 pm to FooManChoo
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:39 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Well, "marriage" was viewed as a fundamental right by the founders, but I'm sure they wouldn't have agreed that it was an unlimited right which included homosexuality, polygamy, or any other form that many are proposing as acceptable today.
I believe in property ownership, but I wouldn't take it to the absurd extreme they did with the ownership of people.
1
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:44 pm to Sentrius
Good.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:46 pm to FT
quote:My point was just that "rights" are limited to one degree or another, so even if there was an understood right to marriage, it would have been limited in certain ways, just like our other rights.
I believe in property ownership, but I wouldn't take it to the absurd extreme they did with the ownership of people.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:49 pm to Rex
quote:
Wished I had my Maggie head with me so I could carry a protest sign saying BESTIALITY IS NEXT.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:50 pm to Rex
quote:
Wished I had my Maggie head with me so I could carry a protest sign saying BESTIALITY IS NEXT.
NO, polygamist's marriage rights are next.
They should have been ahead of the gays anyway. I expect full support for polygamists from all gay marriage rights supporters.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:52 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
NO, polygamist's marriage rights are next.
They should have been ahead of the gays anyway. I expect full support for polygamists from all gay marriage rights supporters.
Can't I just do what I've been doing and not give a frick?
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:53 pm to TrueTiger
quote:Done.
NO, polygamist's marriage rights are next.
They should have been ahead of the gays anyway. I expect full support for polygamists from all gay marriage rights supporters.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 4:55 pm to Vols&Shaft83
quote:
Can't I just do what I've been doing and not give a frick?
sure, as long as you are consistent with your apathy.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:02 pm to Toddy
quote:
North Carolina's AG just announced he will no longer defend that state's ban after the 4th Circuit ruling today.
Must be nice to be able to refuse to do your fricking job.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:03 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
sure, as long as you are consistent with your apathy.
I don't care enough to be apathetic
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:04 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
I expect full support for polygamists from all gay marriage rights supporters.
Doesn't bother me
I couldn't give two shits less what grown, consenting adults do in their bedroom or want to call themselves.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:05 pm to Sentrius
quote:Virginia had a Gay Marriage Ban?
Virginia's Gay Marriage Ban
After Loving v Va?
Either those Virginians are dumbass folks, or the OP is misstated.
Which is it?
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:07 pm to FT
quote:
Toddy has a thunder arse hole?
I leave for 30 minutes and this is what happens???? Sheeeesh!!
Posted on 7/28/14 at 5:29 pm to TrueTiger
expect full support for polygamists from all gay marriage rights supporters.
gays are more than jealous about their lovers.
gays are more than jealous about their lovers.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 6:31 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Loving v Va
It would be historically ironic and deja vu as hell if SCOTUS took the Virginia case to strike down gay marriage bans nation wide. They have a choice of taking cases from Utah, Oklahoma, or Virginia for the 2014 term.
Imo, Gay marriage on SCOTUS will probably be 6-3 or 7-2 in favor of but it wouldn't be surprising for it to be unanimous as well like loving was.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 6:33 pm to Sentrius
Yes! We're one step closer to me never having to give a shite again.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:05 pm to UL-SabanRival
quote:
Yes! We're one step closer to me never having to give a shite again.
Wrong.
Next step will be forcing churches to conduct ceremonies.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 7:38 pm to weagle99
quote:
Next step will be forcing churches to conduct ceremonies.
Religious freedom and religious freedom of association actually gets a lot of protection from SCOTUS. shite, look at the recent uproar over hobby lobby.
I'm not convinced this prediction has any merit to it whatsoever. However, I will be your comrade in arms if Statists of any sort wishes to tread this ground that should not be approached.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 8:31 pm to weagle99
quote:
Next step will be forcing churches to conduct ceremonies.
looking forward to that.
Posted on 7/28/14 at 8:35 pm to asurob1
quote:
looking forward to that.
Then I will be there to oppose you and do everything in my power to prevent this statist, freedom and liberty hating dream of yours from ever becoming reality.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News