Started By
Message

re: Do you believe in Social Security choice?

Posted on 7/7/14 at 3:20 pm to
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Meaning being able to opt out of mandated social security and invest your own money into your own personal retirement account that politicians can't dip into.

I support this and am pro-choice when it comes to Social Security.

I want to hear reasons why this is a bad idea.




You're proposing that we replace an insurance program with a savings program.

That would kinda defeat the point of having an insurance program.


If you know any history it also means every few decades millions of people will become destitute in retirement all at once.


Now - if you want to ADD individual retirement accounts to the program I'll all for it. Take the regular, what is it, 12% combined EE+ER SS insurance contributions and add in another - say - 4% required retirement savings contributions - and I think that's a good idea.
This post was edited on 7/7/14 at 3:22 pm
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112611 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

If you know any history it also means every few decades millions of people will become destitute in retirement all at once.

So, what's your point?
Posted by Hog on the Hill
AR
Member since Jun 2009
13389 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

You're proposing that we replace an insurance program with a savings program.

That would kinda defeat the point of having an insurance program.


If you know any history it also means every few decades millions of people will become destitute in retirement all at once.


Now - if you want to ADD individual retirement accounts to the program I'll all for it. Take the regular, what is it, 12% combined EE+ER SS insurance contributions and add in another - say - 4% required retirement savings contributions - and I think that's a good idea.
Ah shite, I always forget it's Social Security Insurance. It makes a little more sense that we can't control the investments.

I agree that adding a savings/investment program to SS would be a good idea. I don't know about tacking on another 4% that gets taken from your paycheck... but restructuring SS to allow for investing sounds like a nice thing.

I think Australia has a mandatory retirement savings program and it seems to work reasonably well. I'm not an expert on it, though.
This post was edited on 7/7/14 at 3:29 pm
Posted by goldennugget
Hating Masks
Member since Jul 2013
24514 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

You're proposing that we replace an insurance program with a savings program.


Insurance

Social Security is barely enough to live on

Right now its about $1100 a month for a retired person. That's not much to live on. So you are screwed if you didn't save anything before hand.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11488 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 4:00 pm to
quote:

You're proposing that we replace an insurance program with a savings program.

That would kinda defeat the point of having an insurance program.


For someone with such a self reported high IQ you don't have a damn clue what the term insurance means.

Obamacare and SS are not forms of insurance. Insurance may or may not get paid out for a specified risk. Obamacare and SS get paid out no matter what and the premiums are not calculated based on said risk.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21412 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 4:02 pm to
quote:

Now - if you want to ADD individual retirement accounts to the program I'll all for it.


Two words:

frick NO
This post was edited on 7/7/14 at 4:07 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram