Started By
Message

re: No one is coming to take your guns: States thinking of passing gun seizure laws

Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:01 am to
Posted by nsudemon10
EBRP
Member since Dec 2010
572 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:01 am to
Looking at the long term.. How cost effective is it to invest getting the equipment and making your own ammo with all the shortages? Im sure when shite hits the fan it will be hard to get ammo or it will be to high to purchase. The economy down here will drop I'm sure for some time period.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:05 am to
If you are reloading .308, .45 or larger it is worth it now on a not very large scale. If you get into less than mass available rounds such as .50 cal .338, 45-70 you are winning with every batch of 25 or more.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39975 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:27 am to
5-0. shoot me an email. Want you to check out some softtware.

genejr at bayou d0t net
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:35 am to
sent from: Five-0@officerresource.com
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:42 am to
I remember the patriot act

We're only spying on terrorist...scout's honor
Posted by MisterSenator
Member since Aug 2013
1285 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 1:18 am to
quote:

You do not see the seizure of private property (forget that we are talking about guns) without due process?


bingo
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
29483 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 1:59 am to
quote:

American citizens won't have guns in two generations. But you will probably be able to keep yours for at least another 20 years.



This post was edited on 7/7/14 at 2:00 am
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98190 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 5:47 am to
Andrew Jackson is responsible for the trail o tears. F him. He was just as willing to use the oppressive power of the state as anyone else.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
34946 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 7:34 am to
quote:

I'm very pro 2A and I'll probably catch a lot of hell over this, but I don't see too much harm in something like this if there is very credible and sufficient evidence that the person is very clearly mentally disturbed.


Extrapolation...required, UG.

Think.........I-R-S!

"Mentally disturbed", can be highly subjective, viewed through a political lens.

Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10052 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 8:05 am to
Posted by Ralph_Wiggum
Sugarland
Member since Jul 2005
10667 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

The South will be the firearm and ammo production capital of the world before they are finished. Selfishly, I'm good with it.


The Russians and Chinese can easily out-produce the 11 former states of the confederacy.
Posted by Five0
Member since Dec 2009
11354 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 9:19 am to
Pick me up a couple of boxes when you go there.
Posted by Vols&Shaft83
Throbbing Member
Member since Dec 2012
69915 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 9:22 am to
quote:

The Russians and Chinese can easily out-produce the 11 former states of the confederacy.




Could they? Your big Red machine?
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16744 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 10:40 am to
I dont see a problem with this at the state level. A little scarier at the federal level, but the concept i think is solid as long as they clearly state how they detrmine someone isnt fit for posession - some type of formal evaluation from the medical field reviewed by a judge in the form of a warrant would be appropriate.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39975 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 10:49 am to
quote:

The Russians and Chinese can easily out-produce the 11 former states of the confederacy.


Two super powers can out-produce the SEC? You don't say!
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33006 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 11:57 am to
My issue is this - in the small state of Connecticut, the police found 183 people last year alone that they deemed a threat to others. That number sounds high to me and I wonder what criteria they use to make that determination.
Posted by The Third Leg
Idiot Out Wandering Around
Member since May 2014
10052 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 12:48 pm to
Lol, 183 is high?

There are 3.6M people in Connecticut.
Posted by lsu13lsu
Member since Jan 2008
11484 posts
Posted on 7/7/14 at 1:42 pm to
quote:

As state officials across the country grapple with how to prevent mass killings like the ones at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown and near the University of California, Santa Barbara


I love this. How many were killed in our cities worst neighborhoods this weekend? Massive amounts. They always try and use these school shootings because they would get no where if they blamed poor minorities for violent crime in this country.
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 10Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram