- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The ACLU's disappointing stance on the Hobby Lobby decision
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to efrad
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:02 pm to efrad
quote:
but this point is really irrelevant
No it's not
quote:
we could be talking about anything
We are talking about birth control, something that HL provided prior to Obama care
quote:
Exempting one company from the law based on their religious beliefs and not exempting all other companies.
Perhaps, these other companies you speak about should file their own lawsuit it they do not like the provisions of the law.
2
Posted on 7/2/14 at 11:06 pm to ruzil
(no message)
This post was edited on 4/20/21 at 8:42 pm
Posted on 7/3/14 at 12:29 am to ruzil
quote:
We are talking about birth control, something that HL provided prior to Obama care
I didn't read the case but I believe what was at issue is that the HHS mandate required that they give coverage for the MAP. HL believed that was an abortion inducing drug, so they fought having to pay for it on religious grounds. HL has no issues with BC as long as it doesn't induce an abortion. People are trying to tear down HL by making them look like they aren't really against BC. Well they aren't but they are against the MAP and other drugs like it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News