- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: i7-4700MQ vs A10-5750M processors
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:58 am to InVolNerable
Posted on 6/10/14 at 11:58 am to InVolNerable
That's actually a difficult decision, especially with the work you're planning to do with it. Are you going to be using those programs often (hours a day)? Is its performance in those particular programs of the utmost importance?
I ask because the CPU performance will be the most important feature, and the 4700MQ's single-threaded performance is 50% better than that A10, and in multi-threaded applications, the 4700MQ would be close to twice as fast as the A10, and just a teeny tiny bit more power efficient.
What the A10 has going for it is the superior integrated graphics, hence the 1080p panel. It's a good option for an entertainment laptop (maybe even for very, very light gaming). It's a difficult choice, because the low-res screen kind of sucks for image-editing work but would give you far superior performance.
If we're talking about heavy editing work as part of your job, neither laptop is all that great of a choice. Does it have to be from Costco? Retail brick-and-mortar store models are often configured so strangely.
I ask because the CPU performance will be the most important feature, and the 4700MQ's single-threaded performance is 50% better than that A10, and in multi-threaded applications, the 4700MQ would be close to twice as fast as the A10, and just a teeny tiny bit more power efficient.
What the A10 has going for it is the superior integrated graphics, hence the 1080p panel. It's a good option for an entertainment laptop (maybe even for very, very light gaming). It's a difficult choice, because the low-res screen kind of sucks for image-editing work but would give you far superior performance.
If we're talking about heavy editing work as part of your job, neither laptop is all that great of a choice. Does it have to be from Costco? Retail brick-and-mortar store models are often configured so strangely.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 12:30 pm to ILikeLSUToo
quote:
jcole4lsu & ILikeLSUToo
Thanks both for the responses.
quote:
Are you going to be using those programs often (hours a day)?
It'll be a personal computer that I use occasionally for work, but I'd still like whichever laptop I choose to be able to handle those programs smoothly. I probably won't finalize work from it, but I'd like to be able to have set up a nice workflow on it when need be.
Any gaming would be Fallout/Fallout 2 as a time killer in the airport; nothing intensive.
Other than that, it'll be used for the typical watch movies, browse internet, Microsoft Office usage, etc.
quote:
Does it have to be from Costco?
Not necessarily. It just seemed after searching Newegg, Amazon, and Costco to be the best bang for the buck.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News