Started By
Message

re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?

Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:11 pm to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:11 pm to
Widespread anti vaccine movement is more damaging than widespread GW disbelief. Both of our worries rely on what-ifs.

You rely on GW not being bullshite and I rely on stupidity growing. Since it is a fact that if most people shunned vaccinations people would die rather than uncertainty, I consider it the more harmful movement.
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 8:12 pm
Posted by Zed
Member since Feb 2010
8315 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

Widespread anti vaccine movement is more damaging than widespread GW disbelief.
I don't think Americans are stupid enough to let it get to the point that it causes outbreaks, but I could be wrong. If the skepticism spreads to Asia or Africa, assuming it hasn't already, I'd get considerably more worried.
Posted by Sleeping Tiger
Member since Sep 2013
8488 posts
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

Widespread anti vaccine movement is more damaging than widespread GW disbelief. Both of our worries rely on what-ifs.



Not really.

Vaccines have ingredients. Ingredients that don't need to be in our bodies can be identified, there isn't an 'if' involved.

And global warming arguments are useless. Does the data matter? We need to be more responsible, and not in a bike path kinda way, this recognition has nothing to do with partisan arguments about global warming data.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram