- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Anti- science liberals vs anti-science conservatives: who is more dangerous?
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:01 pm to C
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:01 pm to C
GMOs are bad, but what really should be talked about is farming practices, too often the debate is simply about GMO vs non GMO.
Vaccines are bad, even if you think they're good it's evident that most contain unnecessary toxic elements.
Support for nuclear energy highlights the short term thought process and normalcy bias most people live by.
Anti evolution is insane, everything is evolving.
Global warming debate is irrelevant. Both sides have an agenda. The left uses it as a way to bring about more taxes and government control. The right denies it as a way to justify continued unchecked destruction of the planet. The truth is it doesn't matter what the data says, we need to be more responsible, starting now. A system that requires constant growth is not sustainable.
Vaccines are bad, even if you think they're good it's evident that most contain unnecessary toxic elements.
Support for nuclear energy highlights the short term thought process and normalcy bias most people live by.
Anti evolution is insane, everything is evolving.
Global warming debate is irrelevant. Both sides have an agenda. The left uses it as a way to bring about more taxes and government control. The right denies it as a way to justify continued unchecked destruction of the planet. The truth is it doesn't matter what the data says, we need to be more responsible, starting now. A system that requires constant growth is not sustainable.
This post was edited on 6/9/14 at 8:02 pm
4
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:04 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Vaccines are bad, even if you think they're good it's evident that most contain unnecessary toxic elements.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 8:05 pm to Sleeping Tiger
Sleeping Tiger is here to tell us Sheeple why we're all doomed.
The end is near, it's the corporations man.
The end is near, it's the corporations man.
Posted on 6/9/14 at 10:37 pm to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Vaccines are bad, even if you think they're good it's evident that most contain unnecessary toxic elements.
Oh frick me.....
You do realize that just because someone has mercury within it, it doesn't mean it is inherently toxic.
That isn't how chemistry works.
quote:
Support for nuclear energy highlights the short term thought process and normalcy bias most people live by.
Im more on the fence on this topic....but the fact remains while while nuclear waste is a problem, relatively very very little of it is produced.
Enough to make it easily possible to store it indefinitely even if nuclear power is used on the continental scale.
Posted on 6/10/14 at 9:00 am to Sleeping Tiger
quote:
Vaccines are bad, even if you think they're good it's evident that most contain unnecessary toxic elements.
Maybe when your kid dies from measles you'll understand just how idiotic you are.
LINK
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News