Started By
Message

re: FBI Urged to Investigate James O'Keefe

Posted on 5/22/14 at 1:23 am to
Posted by LSUGrrrl
Frisco, TX
Member since Jul 2007
33534 posts
Posted on 5/22/14 at 1:23 am to
I thought recording law varied state to state. Does California consider a restaurant a public place, thus there is no expectation of privacy? Does California require both parties to be aware of phone call recordings? I believe it does. If so, he broke the law if he didn't tell the other person on the call that, it was being recorded. Also, the public place exclusion may not pply if he were a party to the conversation, only a bystander.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
21459 posts
Posted on 5/22/14 at 7:10 am to
I like some of the stuff O'Keefe has been doing. However, I also see him as a Grade-A douche.

After his stunt at Landrieu's office, you'd think he'd wise up a bit.
Posted by Hawkeye95
Member since Dec 2013
20293 posts
Posted on 5/22/14 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I thought recording law varied state to state. Does California consider a restaurant a public place, thus there is no expectation of privacy? Does California require both parties to be aware of phone call recordings? I believe it does. If so, he broke the law if he didn't tell the other person on the call that, it was being recorded. Also, the public place exclusion may not pply if he were a party to the conversation, only a bystander.

they do. I had a boss who was trying to intimidate me (you wouldn't believe the shite he said), and he was located in california. I was going to try to record the conversation, even though I am not in california, since he is I would have to abide by california rules.

Not sure why the FBI is involved though, since that is a state law.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram