- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pacers 83 vs Heat 87 Game 2 FINAL
Posted on 5/20/14 at 10:45 pm to shel311
Posted on 5/20/14 at 10:45 pm to shel311
Yeah nvm 5 out of 7 is too much.
I was initially thinking when I brought it up that it was still 2-3-2 so I have much less of a problem with it being 2-2-1-1-1.
I was initially thinking when I brought it up that it was still 2-3-2 so I have much less of a problem with it being 2-2-1-1-1.
This post was edited on 5/20/14 at 10:49 pm
3
Posted on 5/20/14 at 10:45 pm to Othello
quote:
I just like the idea of 2-2-3. Its simple and and it seems quite fair to me.
You keep saying this.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 10:46 pm to Othello
Road teams already struggle in the playoffs. That would make it even more difficult on them.
Posted on 5/20/14 at 10:47 pm to Othello
How does that seem fair though??
The 2 seed only gets 2 home games in a 7 game series. Thats crap.
Its already set up where the lower seed has to win a game on the road, and the higher seed just needs to win at home. If they win at home, they dont have to win on the road.
The 2 seed only gets 2 home games in a 7 game series. Thats crap.
Its already set up where the lower seed has to win a game on the road, and the higher seed just needs to win at home. If they win at home, they dont have to win on the road.
This post was edited on 5/20/14 at 10:48 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News