Started By
Message

re: Why did the RIAA &MPAA target peer-to-peer networks instead of one-click hosts?

Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:07 am to
Posted by Dam Guide
Member since Sep 2005
15535 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:07 am to
quote:

So here's my question. Why do the parties suing individuals always go after peer-to-peer users rather than users on single click hosting and/or streaming sites? Is it easier? Does it require fewer subpoenas to access records? Or do IP addresses disappear when uploaded to a storing site like Rapidshare or one of the streaming sites? Aren't they basically the exact same thing otherwise?


Single click hosters like letwatchthis/onechannel are normally based outside of the USA in countries that don't have/don't enforce copyright laws. Basically you can't sue them in the USA because they don't operate in the USA.

You can't subpeona them to get their traffic info for the same reason.

Posted by iliveinabox
in a box
Member since Aug 2011
24115 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:10 am to
quote:

based outside of the USA
si... Just get yourself a good proxy mayne
Posted by Keys Open Doors
In hiding with Tupac & XXXTentacion
Member since Dec 2008
31936 posts
Posted on 5/19/14 at 9:13 am to
That makes sense. So were Limewire, Bit Torrent, and all of the other major sites for either single files or torrents based in the US?

Interesting to see how international copyright issues and subpoena powers are the main determinant of the lawsuits.

ETA: Okay next question. How was Mega Upload seized by the US gov't when its founders are from New Zealand and the company was based in Hong Kong?
This post was edited on 5/19/14 at 9:17 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram