- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Caplan libertarian test
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:49 pm to son of arlo
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:49 pm to son of arlo
quote:
Is it morally permissible to exercise "vigilante justice," even against government leaders?
Battle of Athens
Not only morally permissible, but some would consider it a duty.
0
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:50 pm to a want
quote:
I think if you spent time here, you might grade out a little differently.
I prefer Lichtenstein, which is essentially an anarcho-monarchy.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:51 pm to a want
quote:
Disband military?
This was a poorly worded item. That's why I was at variance on the military issues. They did not specify privatization of the military. They just said get rid of it.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:53 pm to a want
quote:
Privatize courts? Privatize the law? Disband military? Vigilante justice? Sweet Jesus!
It's rare that I agree with a want, but when I do, it is usually emphatic agreement.
Endorsed, upvoted and
Posted on 5/17/14 at 12:59 pm to Zach
Soft core libertarian 
, 27.
Still like the quizzes that measure things based on importance (i.e, foreign policy issues are less important than some economic issues for example)
, 27. Still like the quizzes that measure things based on importance (i.e, foreign policy issues are less important than some economic issues for example)
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:01 pm to son of arlo
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/18/14 at 6:47 pm
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:04 pm to Turkey_Creek_Tiger
I think he was making fun of our beloved otto.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:11 pm to HempHead
145.
I've lapsed from anarcho-capitalism and started making excuses for monopoly court systems. I'm sure I'll drift back eventually.
I've lapsed from anarcho-capitalism and started making excuses for monopoly court systems. I'm sure I'll drift back eventually.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:13 pm to HempHead
56. I feel like a fricking commie now.
I think the questions make too large of a jump, like from "Should military budget be cut" straight to "Should the military budget be cut 75%". I'd be down for a 40% cut and wouldn't feel uncomfortable with cutting it in half. There were a few examples like that where I was definitely willing to go beyond the first level of questions, but not to the extreme of the next level.
I think the questions make too large of a jump, like from "Should military budget be cut" straight to "Should the military budget be cut 75%". I'd be down for a 40% cut and wouldn't feel uncomfortable with cutting it in half. There were a few examples like that where I was definitely willing to go beyond the first level of questions, but not to the extreme of the next level.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:18 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
145.
I've lapsed from anarcho-capitalism and started making excuses for monopoly court systems. I'm sure I'll drift back eventually.
Yeah - you're the other AC Josh - I thought you would be higher - perhaps in the 150s.
Norris probably added questions to exceed 160 (as did Wiki and GMorgan).
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:20 pm to Ace Midnight
45
quote:
Your libertarian credentials are obvious. Doubtlessly you will become more extreme as time goes on.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:30 pm to Zach
108 
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:34 pm to Zach
112
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:35 pm to ehidal1
Huh, only got a 14
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:39 pm to Ace Midnight
quote:
Yeah - you're the other AC Josh - I thought you would be higher - perhaps in the 150s.
Norris probably added questions to exceed 160 (as did Wiki and GMorgan).
Like I said, I'm currently in a minarchist rut. Plus, the "do you call yourself an an-cap" question is rather silly. You already docked me for saying I want a monopoly court system. Docking me twice seems a bit much
My only three nos were the courts being privatized, law being privatized, and the silly last ancap question. Five points each.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:40 pm to Zach
110.
I'm curious to see Rex and Sleeping Tiger's score.
I'm curious to see Rex and Sleeping Tiger's score.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:45 pm to stuntman
58
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:45 pm to Jake88
quote:
I'm sure privatization of the police and courts is a great idea and would be a huge improvement.
Exactly. A police force that is incentive driven would be complete bullshite.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:48 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
A police force that is incentive driven would be complete bullshite.
Well, apparently the current police get bonuses for shooting dogs.
Posted on 5/17/14 at 1:49 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
145. I've lapsed from anarcho-capitalism and started making excuses for monopoly court systems. I'm sure I'll drift back eventually.
To function properly, courts, especially those of last resort, need contempt and subpoena powers (anyone who doesn't understand why, doesn't understand the court system, or even basic principles of dispute resolution). I've repeatedly asked the "private" court proponents where their courts will derive subpoena and contempt power, and I've yet to see a good answer.
This post was edited on 5/17/14 at 1:52 pm
Page 3 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News