Started By
Message

re: China admits pollution brought about 'cancer villages'

Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:27 pm to
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:27 pm to
This is where I tend to fall but I have trouble reconciling this with libertarian philosophy. I want to accept it, I really do, but there're some road blocks I just cannot get past.

It is more intellectually honest to say "all regulation is bad" than it is to say "some regulation is bad", because then by what metric do you determine which regulations are bad and which are good?

An argument I heard on another board was that china has too much central planning to be considered a true free-market system, despite lax regulations.

I suppose I just find these types of scenarios interesting as they challenge my political leanings.
This post was edited on 5/5/14 at 2:01 pm
Posted by BRUNNIN4
DFW
Member since Mar 2010
3062 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 1:43 pm to
quote:

This is where I tend to fall but I have trouble reconciling this with libertarian philosophy. I want to accept it, I really do, but there's some road blocks I just cannot get past.

It is more intellectually honest to say "all regulation is bad" than it is to say "some regulation is bad", because then by what metric do you determine which regulations are bad and which are good?

Milton Friedman on regulation
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98454 posts
Posted on 5/5/14 at 2:02 pm to
We had what was for all practical purposes no environmental regulations throughout approximately the first half of American history, resulting in things like the Johnstown Flood. LINK

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram