Started By
Message

Term or Whole? Insurance

Posted on 4/30/14 at 12:51 pm
Posted by Phattie Jet
LaPlace
Member since Aug 2012
307 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 12:51 pm
Which is the suggested way to go-38 yrs old, excellent health, wanting to protect my family and assets.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Alpha Silverfox
Member since Oct 2011
41721 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

38 yrs old, excellent health, wanting to protect my family and assets.

$1M or $2M 30-year term policy. Do not get Whole Life unless you are very wealthy.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
34912 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 1:46 pm to
Why not both?

You don't have to be super wealthy to get WL. Yes, it is more expensive than term, but if you are actually investing the difference, you are paying the same amount anyways.

Now, if you are down to getting your death benefit in term and that is all you can spend, or spending that amount in WL, then go term.

Where did you get the $1M number from? Have you don't an actual death benefit calculation? L30 may be a good choice, but a corresponding term 80 policy may actually be cheaper over the 30 years, I'd have to look at the actual numbers, but jus something else to think about.
Posted by iknowmorethanyou
Paydirt
Member since Jul 2007
6550 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 1:53 pm to
The correct answer is you've supplied an insufficient amount of information so far.
Posted by olemissfan26
MS
Member since Apr 2012
6242 posts
Posted on 4/30/14 at 9:55 pm to
I'd say do whole to the amount you can afford and term to cover the rest so you are at least getting a little return on the investment

ETA: what I'm saying is a mix of both is good
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 9:57 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram