We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader) - Page 3 - TigerDroppings.com

Posted byMessage
Napoleon
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2007
33867 posts
 Online 

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


My bad. brain fart.

I do not think Nawlins is a reader based on past posts.






Back to top
magildachunks
Member since Oct 2006
10614 posts
 Online 

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


What did he spoil?


Seems like a legitimate theory without spoiling anything.






Back to top
Napoleon
New Orleans Saints Fan
Member since Dec 2007
33867 posts
 Online 

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


quote:

What did he spoil?


Seems like a legitimate theory without spoiling anything.



It was. Unfortunately this will happen for every episode that has a cliffhanger.







Back to top
JimMorrison
USA Fan
The Peninsula
Member since May 2012
14918 posts

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


posting any kind of theory that turns out to be right will cause you to be labeled as a reader.

there are also a ton of the so called "hodors" that read the wiki pages extensively. they are quasi-readers because the amount of time they spend reading the wiki, they could have read one of the damn books in the series.






Back to top
Nonetheless
Kentucky Fan
Lebron fan
Member since Jan 2012
13760 posts

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


I'm not going in GoT threads anymore to lurk.


This post was edited on 4/25 at 10:14 pm


Back to top
Spirit of Dunson
Columbia Fan
Member since Mar 2007
21478 posts
 Online 

re: We have a highly likely book reader openly spoiling in the HODOR (non-reader)


Can we get a spoiler warning on this thread for the non-reading delayed watchers? A lot of people wait until the end of the season to watch all episodes in a marathon, and this thread could spoil that.

Next time I may RA.






Back to top


Back to top




//