- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Mett and Pats
Posted on 4/20/14 at 12:52 pm to abellsujr
Posted on 4/20/14 at 12:52 pm to abellsujr
Calling Brady injury prone is a bit of a stretch.
I agree though that being drafted by the pats would be a great opportunity for Mett to learn from some of the best in the business.
A better place for him though is Arizona with Arians and an aging Carson Palmer.
I agree though that being drafted by the pats would be a great opportunity for Mett to learn from some of the best in the business.
A better place for him though is Arizona with Arians and an aging Carson Palmer.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:01 pm to rlebl39
Yeah, i should have said i think he's prone to injury at this point in his career. He's getting up there in age. But for whatever reason, the Patriots are looking heavily at every QB in the draft, accourding to the article.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:02 pm to abellsujr
quote:
I get it, gang up on the guy with little post experiance. That's fine. I do remember Brady getting injured before the championship game in his first productive season also. No biggie man if you wanna have the last word, it's all yours. Happy Easter!
So an ankle injury that kept him out of 1 game 13 years ago
And a knee injury that happened 6-7 years ago
Gosh, he just cant stay on the field can he
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:03 pm to abellsujr
quote:
Yeah, i should have said i think he's prone to injury at this point in his career. He's getting up there in age. But for whatever reason, the Patriots are looking heavily at every QB in the draft, accourding to the article.
They are looking at QBs because Mallet is going to walk next season in FA.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:07 pm to abellsujr
"The Patriots might be thinking now about what they’ll do at quarterback when Tom Brady retires. Or they could be trying to light a fire under Brady. Or they could be trying to pick the brains of as many quarterbacks as they can, as offensive schemes increasingly migrate from college to the NFL. Whatever the reasons, by the time of the draft in three weeks, it appears that the Patriots will have talked to just about every available quarterback."
Maybe NBC sports should have called you for your opinion wildtiger.
Maybe NBC sports should have called you for your opinion wildtiger.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:10 pm to abellsujr
Why the hell would they need to light a fire under brady? thats the dumbest thing ive ever heard this side of "Brady is injury prone"
The Pats are looking at a new backup QB because they have no QBs on the roster signed past this season besides Brady. End of story. They draft a mid round QB every couple of years to develop
The Pats are looking at a new backup QB because they have no QBs on the roster signed past this season besides Brady. End of story. They draft a mid round QB every couple of years to develop
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:13 pm to wildtigercat93
If only we all had your great football knowledge "o" great one. You must have some NFL connections.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:17 pm to abellsujr
No i just have common sense
What sources did nbc cite there? None. They just threw shite guesses against the wall to drum up interest. Welcome to todays media.
What sources did nbc cite there? None. They just threw shite guesses against the wall to drum up interest. Welcome to todays media.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:19 pm to wildtigercat93
And your sources? This is my first blog argument by the way. It's allot fun. I'm having a blast.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:23 pm to abellsujr
Neither has sources. Im not claiming to have sources.
You posting an nbc writers outlandish guesses into why the Pats are working out QBs does not prove any point, its just another opinion.
The difference my opinion and his is, im not trying to create drama in order to raise interest in what im writing. Im just using common sense and logic based on the available information.
And this isnt a blog
You posting an nbc writers outlandish guesses into why the Pats are working out QBs does not prove any point, its just another opinion.
The difference my opinion and his is, im not trying to create drama in order to raise interest in what im writing. Im just using common sense and logic based on the available information.
And this isnt a blog
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:34 pm to wildtigercat93
Sorry, "thread". Look man, I'm just saying I wouldn't mind if Mett went to New England. Clearly, you would mind. I saw the article on Yahoo and wanted to post it. Next time i'lll ask for your approval before i post one.
Are there better destinations for Mett, sure. Are there worse destinations, sure. I think I can concede that Brady is not injury prone, but he is not going to last forever. I think playing for one of the best coaches in NFL history who helped develop one of the best QBs in history to me would be good for him. This was fun, though.
Are there better destinations for Mett, sure. Are there worse destinations, sure. I think I can concede that Brady is not injury prone, but he is not going to last forever. I think playing for one of the best coaches in NFL history who helped develop one of the best QBs in history to me would be good for him. This was fun, though.
This post was edited on 4/20/14 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:41 pm to abellsujr
i never said he was a bad fit in New England
I only disagreed with you about Bradys injuries and the Pats motives for looking at QBs.
I only disagreed with you about Bradys injuries and the Pats motives for looking at QBs.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:49 pm to wildtigercat93
Oh, we'll thanks for clearing that up. I guess we're in agreement. But you're not interested in agreeing are you? God forbid you would post what you agree with.That doesn't draw enough attention. Thanks for helping me get my post numbers up.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 1:53 pm to abellsujr
Were in agreement about Mett being a good fit with the Pats
The other stuff not so much, so i voiced my opinion on it. Thats how message boards work.
The other stuff not so much, so i voiced my opinion on it. Thats how message boards work.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 2:01 pm to wildtigercat93
I'm learning. Thanks for the lesson. Lol.
Posted on 4/20/14 at 2:21 pm to harry coleman beast
quote:
Fair enough but Rodgers beat out Favre because he was better.
Favre retired then wanted to come back and the pats had already moved on.
Its not like he beat him out in open camp
Posted on 4/20/14 at 2:32 pm to SammyTiger
quote:
Favre retired then wanted to come back and the pats had already moved on. Its not like he beat him out in open camp
I remember mcarthy not being too fond of Favre also. There was allot of contention there.
This post was edited on 4/20/14 at 2:33 pm
Posted on 4/20/14 at 5:13 pm to wildtigercat93
Stahp being so mean on the new guys. Make sure to not point out the fact Brady is signed until he's 40 or the fact he was still good enough to drag a piss poor receiving corps one game away from the Super Bowl.
Posted on 4/21/14 at 2:57 am to abellsujr
quote:
"The Patriots might be thinking now about what they’ll do at quarterback when Tom Brady retires. Or they could be trying to light a fire under Brady. Or they could be trying to pick the brains of as many quarterbacks as they can, as offensive schemes increasingly migrate from college to the NFL. Whatever the reasons, by the time of the draft in three weeks, it appears that the Patriots will have talked to just about every available quarterback."
Light a fire under Brady ???
may be the dumbest shite ever posted on this board....
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News