- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is 2014 football a "rebuilding" year?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:25 pm to Guava Jelly
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:25 pm to Guava Jelly
quote:
In summation, you are a miserable turd, and I will suffer this conversation no longer.
you spend your days calling people turds on the internet who don't share your assessment of LSU's prospective depth chart and i'm the miserable one.. ok
1
Posted on 4/17/14 at 7:26 pm to madddoggydawg
I think 10 wins in asking alot of this team at this point. I'll be ok with 9-4, if they beat the gumps. 
This post was edited on 4/17/14 at 9:30 pm
Posted on 4/17/14 at 8:09 pm to JawjaTigah
quote:Dynasty?
You can't build a dynasty that way, or maintain one.
We have NEVER been a dynasty.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 8:48 pm to JawjaTigah
I understand our QBS will be green but our competition is in the same situation - Bama and TXAM. How can you say we're fricked?
Posted on 4/17/14 at 9:16 pm to madddoggydawg
Since nobody else said it, I will:
We will not lose to Wisconsin.
We will not lose to Ole Piss.
We will not lose to Wisconsin.
We will not lose to Ole Piss.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 9:18 pm to madddoggydawg
BS we win 11
Posted on 4/17/14 at 9:35 pm to madddoggydawg
The offense won't be as good, but I expect the d to be better. If for nothing else other than the dbs. Two most experienced players were mills and Loston going into last season. You only lose one, so the secondary will be vastly improved making the rest of the d better.
On offense we need to control the clock and limit turnovers, we've done it before. No reason to think we won't get to 10 wins again.
On offense we need to control the clock and limit turnovers, we've done it before. No reason to think we won't get to 10 wins again.
Posted on 4/17/14 at 11:06 pm to dgnx6
We have won in the past with a one dimensional offense and might do it again this year. Yes, our QBs are really untested but we won't know what happens until they play the games. Teams have won with freshmen QBs so it is possible.
I do not think it is a rebuilding year. Rebuilding to me says we lose 4 games or more and I don't see that happening. If our WRs give minimal support to the run game the offense will be ok.
Our secondary should be better as well as the D-Line. We have guys with experience who seemed to gel later last year.
I do not think it is a rebuilding year. Rebuilding to me says we lose 4 games or more and I don't see that happening. If our WRs give minimal support to the run game the offense will be ok.
Our secondary should be better as well as the D-Line. We have guys with experience who seemed to gel later last year.
Posted on 4/29/14 at 9:38 pm to madddoggydawg
In the hope that madddoggydawg will return and read this, I'll leave this here. Beckwith at MLB
Posted on 4/30/14 at 7:32 am to wildtigercat93
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:31 am to papz
quote:
Top teams reload, renovate, and compete... not rebuild.
This for gods sake! I hate that term "rebuilding." Its a chicken schit way of hedging your bet before the season in case you do crap the bed and don't win as many games as predicted.
Top teams reload and carry on.
This post was edited on 4/30/14 at 11:01 am
Posted on 4/30/14 at 8:46 am to madddoggydawg
We had our "rebuild" year last year on defense. Other than QB and WR their is no rebuilding going on anywhere. I was never a Ego or Freak fan and think we will be better at DL overall this year than last.
We may be too young at QB to get thru the gauntlet unbeaten, which is the biggest concern. If Cam can develop one of these QB's look out. This bunch and coaches are very hungry and 2014 could turn out quite special. Dural is a stud and if Fournette is as advertised it will only be the QB position holding back this hungry bunch of players and coaches.
We may be too young at QB to get thru the gauntlet unbeaten, which is the biggest concern. If Cam can develop one of these QB's look out. This bunch and coaches are very hungry and 2014 could turn out quite special. Dural is a stud and if Fournette is as advertised it will only be the QB position holding back this hungry bunch of players and coaches.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 12:33 pm to madddoggydawg
quote:I agree. The defensive line will get pushed around ALOT, and the offense will be young and talented but full of errors.
For the record I think we can win every game, but I expect us to lose 2-4 because all signs point to 2014 being more significant for the development of underclassmen for our real run at a championship next year.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 1:44 pm to The Mick
quote:
Dynasty? We have NEVER been a dynasty
LSU IS 143-40 since 2000 which is 2nd only to Okla. We are 84-34 in the SEC which is the #1 conference record for that same period. We have 4 SEC titles, 6 west titles, 3 BCSCG appearances, and 2 BCS titles.
If that's not "dynasty" material or down right "dynasty" run for a 13 yr period, then I don't know what would be for the same period.
Posted on 4/30/14 at 2:19 pm to madddoggydawg
This thread sucks nut sack
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News