Started By
Message

re: Trading out of the first round

Posted on 4/13/14 at 1:24 pm to
Posted by adono
River Ridge
Member since Sep 2003
7307 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 1:24 pm to
quote:

Again, my argument has nothing to do with the value of the picks at all.


Then there's no reason to continue this conversation. I don't know how "success" can be determined without consideration of the cost vs. performance element...that doesn't make sense to me.

We'll agree to disagree!
This post was edited on 4/13/14 at 1:25 pm
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/13/14 at 1:28 pm to
Because I'm ignoring cost and considering just performance, and the reason why is cost for a 4th rounder will always be lower than cost for a 1st rounder. That will never change.

I'm not arguing the value because I agree from that aspect. I'm arguing the notion that we can keep getting that value almost at will. Maybe that will make more sense for where you are coming from?

It's not the value, it is the idea that we ALWAYS get it.

Edit:
blues, still have the first bookmarked.

Thanks for the other one too.
This post was edited on 4/13/14 at 1:29 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram