- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Ingram Recruiting Haters
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:37 pm to Hoodoo Man
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:37 pm to Hoodoo Man
Part of it is me typing to quickly and hitting submit before proofing. 
The other part is I hate to double post unless I'm in frick it mode like when quoting from 3 or 4 different posts.
I figure I have to have at least a 95% edited post rate.
Edit:
Or when I forget to put something in or think of something to add in after.
The other part is I hate to double post unless I'm in frick it mode like when quoting from 3 or 4 different posts.
I figure I have to have at least a 95% edited post rate.
Edit:
Or when I forget to put something in or think of something to add in after.
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 11:38 pm
1
Posted on 4/12/14 at 11:46 pm to bonethug0108
Bone, I hope Ingram keeps improving. I love the Saints, and hope players succeed to help the team even if the went to a rival of my alma mater. I think the idiots clamoring 3 picks back then were dumbasses. It was always two picks and was still a waste.
As to the guy claiming it didn't hurt our 2012 draft, wtf are you thinking? We lost the first and the second on top of spending another high pick on Ingram that could've been used better seeing as the Saints best backs have generally been undrafted as of late.
Had we not made the trade we likely still lose the first but keep our 2nd rounder which could've helped the team a ton. Instead people use the excuse we were going to lose it anyway. Even if we lose the first in 2013, that means we spent two second round picks for 3 years at less than 500 yards rushing a year.
As to the guy claiming it didn't hurt our 2012 draft, wtf are you thinking? We lost the first and the second on top of spending another high pick on Ingram that could've been used better seeing as the Saints best backs have generally been undrafted as of late.
Had we not made the trade we likely still lose the first but keep our 2nd rounder which could've helped the team a ton. Instead people use the excuse we were going to lose it anyway. Even if we lose the first in 2013, that means we spent two second round picks for 3 years at less than 500 yards rushing a year.
This post was edited on 4/12/14 at 11:48 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News