Started By
Message

re: Safety in early rounds?

Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:36 pm to
Posted by bonethug0108
Avondale
Member since Mar 2013
12690 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:36 pm to
Okay so point out where I said our receivers are great and don't need to be upgraded.

All of those things make perfect sense of you don't take pieces of it and turn it into crap I'm not saying.

Immediate is the key word in the first one, along with need. I never said we shouldn't look a WR or that we couldn't upgrade, just that we'd be fine.

Nothing wrong with the second one at all.

Third one is true because it's the same people minus Moore and plus Stills heading into each draft. So unless you consider Stills a downgrade, that is a factual statement.

Fourth one again the key word is okay. Never said we'd be great or we shouldn't upgrade.

Fifth one again nothing is wrong and it's factually correct.

So what in the frick is your point?
Posted by Lester Earl
Member since Nov 2003
278817 posts
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:38 pm to
the fact that you think any of those statements are defendable is laughable. Except the last one.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram