- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Safety in early rounds?
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:31 pm to bonethug0108
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:31 pm to bonethug0108
quote:
Everyone agrees with that, yet no one is listening.
quote:
I wouldn't even say there is an immediate need at WR. Colston was still very good(despite what most say about him), Stills is definitely only going to improve and become fully legit, and between Morgan, Toon, and Tanner(lol to most I know) we'll have options for a third target.
quote:
but everyone is making it out to be like the cupboard is bare and we are desperate.
quote:
Actually, going back to last year, we were in a worse(not by much) position at WR.
quote:
I'm saying we would be okay IF(and we won't) went into the season as is.
quote:
Or it could be because we have one of, if not the best, pass catching TEs ever, along with two of the best pass catching HBs ever.
someone said all of these things. js.
1
Posted on 4/6/14 at 6:36 pm to Lester Earl
Okay so point out where I said our receivers are great and don't need to be upgraded.
All of those things make perfect sense of you don't take pieces of it and turn it into crap I'm not saying.
Immediate is the key word in the first one, along with need. I never said we shouldn't look a WR or that we couldn't upgrade, just that we'd be fine.
Nothing wrong with the second one at all.
Third one is true because it's the same people minus Moore and plus Stills heading into each draft. So unless you consider Stills a downgrade, that is a factual statement.
Fourth one again the key word is okay. Never said we'd be great or we shouldn't upgrade.
Fifth one again nothing is wrong and it's factually correct.
So what in the frick is your point?
All of those things make perfect sense of you don't take pieces of it and turn it into crap I'm not saying.
Immediate is the key word in the first one, along with need. I never said we shouldn't look a WR or that we couldn't upgrade, just that we'd be fine.
Nothing wrong with the second one at all.
Third one is true because it's the same people minus Moore and plus Stills heading into each draft. So unless you consider Stills a downgrade, that is a factual statement.
Fourth one again the key word is okay. Never said we'd be great or we shouldn't upgrade.
Fifth one again nothing is wrong and it's factually correct.
So what in the frick is your point?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News