Started By
Message

re: checking Drudge, looks like L.A. could be in trouble

Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:34 pm to
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6608 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:34 pm to
The problem is that places like LA are a time bomb. There will be a big earthquake one day that will cause major devastation, we just don't know if that is tomorrow or in 100 years. Honestly, now that we know the dangers of certain areas, we need to make a lot better choices on where to build. I live in NOLA, but this place will be beachfront property when I die. We need to look at the longevity of certain places we want to build at, and understand the consequences.

Also, screw living in Manhattan. Imagine what would happen in the event of a real disaster there. Why people are still living in dense urban areas doesn't make sense to me.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263197 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

Also, screw living in Manhattan. Imagine what would happen in the event of a real disaster there. Why people are still living in dense urban areas doesn't make sense to me.


The ice storm in Montreal in 1998 was pretty bad. Imagine parts of NY being without power for weeks, or months.
Posted by Easy
Los Angeles
Member since Dec 2008
5687 posts
Posted on 3/30/14 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

The problem is that places like LA are a time bomb. There will be a big earthquake one day that will cause major devastation, we just don't know if that is tomorrow or in 100 years.


Actually South Carolina and Missouri also have good chances of having big ones in our lifetimes and unlike California they will not be prepared for them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram