Started By
Message

re: Is it a good idea to keep 123 million in one checking account?

Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:59 am to
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 9:59 am to
quote:

Umm No. Most banks are only insured up to a certain amount so if they were to get robbed or had a natural disaster he would be SOL. Not sure what the number is though but I wouldn't keep that much money in one location.

Not the banks themselves, but the FDIC

Almost all banks (99%) are, however, members of the FDIC. The FDIC protects deposits up to $100,000
This post was edited on 3/13/14 at 10:00 am
Posted by Geecubed
The Eventual St. George
Member since Apr 2011
425 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:02 am to
quote:

Almost all banks (99%) are, however, members of the FDIC. The FDIC protects deposits up to $100


It's been bumped up to $250k, since I think 2008. FDIC trying to keep people from leaving banks.

On the subject of if it's smart to keep $123MM in a bank account, it depends on what type of bank account. If we are talking checking, then hell no, that is full retard. But if we are talking money market account, mutual fund account, etc., then the bank really doesn't have it.
Posted by O
Mandeville
Member since Oct 2011
6533 posts
Posted on 3/13/14 at 10:07 am to
quote:

The FDIC protects deposits up to $100,000


The FDIC now protects up to $250,000. That extra $150k doesn't do a whole lot of good if the bank goes belly up & he loses $100m+
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram