- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LSU Targets SPARQ rating
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:37 pm to Bayoutigre
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:37 pm to Bayoutigre
quote:kneeling power ball throw
what is kpb?
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:45 pm to twisted tiger
thnx twisted,would have never figured on my own
Posted on 3/2/14 at 12:42 am to ItsThatDude12
quote:
Gotta give the NFL combine bump in 40 times
These times were done electronically and they ran on a slow track. The fastest time was a 4.43 out of over 1,000 participants.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:36 pm to coldhotwings
quote:
These times were done electronically and they ran on a slow track. The fastest time was a 4.43 out of over 1,000 participants.
So at a setting like the Opening, could you see their times like a .10th faster? The times just seemed a bit off to me.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 8:43 pm to Datbayoubengal
Merritt will be a wr. He probably be a slot guy, but he's good at stretching the field and can out jump anyone so his height is less if a factor. His build is close to beckham's.....a little shorter...and no, not beckham in high school...beckham's build as a junior at LSU.
Posted on 3/2/14 at 8:44 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
Lanard Fournette 4:43 40
Posted on 3/2/14 at 9:15 pm to Datbayoubengal
quote:
So at a setting like the Opening, could you see their times like a .10th faster? The times just seemed a bit off to me.
A lot of factors could affect 40 times such as setup, track surface, and whether running into or away from the wind. With that many participants, you'd expect a few guys to break 4.4 with half of them being better track guys than football players. A high of 4.43 out of so many participants should mean that the setting is not as favorable for fast 40 times.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:55 am to RollTigers
quote:
What do we know about this guy? All RB in college? Is he a take?
He would probably be one of the top athletes on LSU's team right now, so I would say yes. Even if he can't get a lot of pt at RB, he would have to be a good fit somewhere. My first though with those numbers would be safety or maybe he could even develop into a monster OLB in Chavis' system if we don't use him on Offense.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:11 am to coldhotwings
quote:
A lot of factors could affect 40 times such as setup, track surface, and whether running into or away from the wind. With that many participants, you'd expect a few guys to break 4.4 with half of them being better track guys than football players. A high of 4.43 out of so many participants should mean that the setting is not as favorable for fast 40 times.
Knowing quite a few kids who went there, I think the times are accurate. A few kids I know actually ran personal bests on saturday.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:42 am to coldhotwings
No one under 4.43 means it is accurate, not the other way around.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:32 am to Maximus
then is it accurate that johnson ran a 4.52. i, for 1, thought he was quite a bit faster than that.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:18 am to Maximus
quote:
No one under 4.43 means it is accurate, not the other way around.
There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43? Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:29 am to coldhotwings
quote:
There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43? Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.
You need to understand a few things. First, several hundred of those kids participating were 7th and 8th graders, and the fastest one was in the 4.7 range I believe. Secondly, to even have a kid run a 4.43 is surprising and means that kid is already at national level speed. In the past 10 years the concept of 40 times has become ridiculous and people don't understand just how fast it truly is to run under 4.6. People are used to hearing lies so often about what the actual times are, in addition to the fact that athletes, coaches and parents are unaware that you have to add .24 seconds to hand time to convert to fully automatic timing to get an accurate mark.
Take a look at the top performers at the last NFL combine: NFL Combine top 40 performers
Notice that only 13 people at the whole combine, where the worlds best athletes prepare to be drafted, broke 4.43. Merrits time this past weekend is INSANE and people can't recognize it because every running back at every high school now runs a "4.3" or "4.4". I don't care what Sonny Ship says, I'll take my years of experience of strength, speed and conditioning athletes over what he thinks.
Just an anecdote to show where part of the problem lies. An athlete I worked with went to an LSU camp a couple summers ago and ran a "4.5". He signs with LSU and shows up to summer workouts the next year in the best shape of his life. He had worked his butt off and was ready to fly. He runs a 4.7 at their team camp. Did he get slower in the course of a year? No, he just wasn't told his correct time the first time around. This leads to kids thinking they are much faster than they really are.
As as side note, the vertical jump mat that kids are using these days are very easy to manipulate. You can add 5+ inches to your vertical just knowing how to land. When you test those kids on a stationary vertical jump tester, they don't jump nearly as high.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:43 am to GhostofJackson
I can't agree with this more. People do not realize how fast 4.6 is for a high school kid.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 1:13 pm to GhostofJackson
quote:
People are used to hearing lies so often about what the actual times are, in addition to the fact that athletes, coaches and parents are unaware that you have to add .24 seconds to hand time to convert to fully automatic timing to get an accurate mark.
Great post GhostofJackson!
I would like to clarify that the 0.24 correction is a rule of thumb that is usually applied to track, as that is the estimated time difference due to the electronic start from the gun, to the electronic finish.
At the NFL combine and other laser/electronic events, they are going on "first movement" and not having to react to a sound or stimulus. That is why you see a smaller correction (about 0.1 seconds) bewteen their hand times and "official" times.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:27 pm to TigerAlum93
I understand that the .24 is for the track, but I often find that it is about the same for hand timed 40s because they are often timed wrong for various reasons. I think it's because people don't time from hand motion and stop when the shoulders lean into the finish, not the torso.
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:39 pm to coldhotwings
quote:
There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43?
Yes. They are in high school.
quote:
Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.
He also said wink wink on speedy noil about 1000 times.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News