Started By
Message

re: LSU Targets SPARQ rating

Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by twisted tiger
Neverland
Member since Nov 2013
452 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:37 pm to
quote:

what is kpb?
kneeling power ball throw
Posted by Bayoutigre
29.9N 92.1W
Member since Feb 2007
5621 posts
Posted on 3/1/14 at 9:45 pm to
thnx twisted,would have never figured on my own
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 12:42 am to
quote:

Gotta give the NFL combine bump in 40 times


These times were done electronically and they ran on a slow track. The fastest time was a 4.43 out of over 1,000 participants.
Posted by recstar7
Bahamas
Member since Sep 2011
1094 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 4:15 pm to
Sounds pretty accurate
Posted by Datbayoubengal
Port City
Member since Sep 2009
26655 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

These times were done electronically and they ran on a slow track. The fastest time was a 4.43 out of over 1,000 participants.


So at a setting like the Opening, could you see their times like a .10th faster? The times just seemed a bit off to me.
Posted by easy money
Member since Feb 2005
14420 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 8:43 pm to
Merritt will be a wr. He probably be a slot guy, but he's good at stretching the field and can out jump anyone so his height is less if a factor. His build is close to beckham's.....a little shorter...and no, not beckham in high school...beckham's build as a junior at LSU.
Posted by No
Westside
Member since Feb 2014
395 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

Lanard Fournette 4:43 40
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 3/2/14 at 9:15 pm to
quote:

So at a setting like the Opening, could you see their times like a .10th faster? The times just seemed a bit off to me.


A lot of factors could affect 40 times such as setup, track surface, and whether running into or away from the wind. With that many participants, you'd expect a few guys to break 4.4 with half of them being better track guys than football players. A high of 4.43 out of so many participants should mean that the setting is not as favorable for fast 40 times.
Posted by Palm Beach Tiger
Orlando, Florida
Member since Jan 2007
29863 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 7:55 am to
quote:

What do we know about this guy? All RB in college? Is he a take?


He would probably be one of the top athletes on LSU's team right now, so I would say yes. Even if he can't get a lot of pt at RB, he would have to be a good fit somewhere. My first though with those numbers would be safety or maybe he could even develop into a monster OLB in Chavis' system if we don't use him on Offense.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:11 am to
quote:

A lot of factors could affect 40 times such as setup, track surface, and whether running into or away from the wind. With that many participants, you'd expect a few guys to break 4.4 with half of them being better track guys than football players. A high of 4.43 out of so many participants should mean that the setting is not as favorable for fast 40 times.


Knowing quite a few kids who went there, I think the times are accurate. A few kids I know actually ran personal bests on saturday.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81262 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 8:42 am to
No one under 4.43 means it is accurate, not the other way around.
Posted by oldschoolgreats
Member since Nov 2012
1902 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 9:32 am to
then is it accurate that johnson ran a 4.52. i, for 1, thought he was quite a bit faster than that.
Posted by coldhotwings
Mississippi
Member since Jan 2008
6497 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 10:18 am to
quote:

No one under 4.43 means it is accurate, not the other way around.


There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43? Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.
This post was edited on 3/3/14 at 10:21 am
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:29 am to
quote:

There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43? Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.


You need to understand a few things. First, several hundred of those kids participating were 7th and 8th graders, and the fastest one was in the 4.7 range I believe. Secondly, to even have a kid run a 4.43 is surprising and means that kid is already at national level speed. In the past 10 years the concept of 40 times has become ridiculous and people don't understand just how fast it truly is to run under 4.6. People are used to hearing lies so often about what the actual times are, in addition to the fact that athletes, coaches and parents are unaware that you have to add .24 seconds to hand time to convert to fully automatic timing to get an accurate mark.

Take a look at the top performers at the last NFL combine: NFL Combine top 40 performers

Notice that only 13 people at the whole combine, where the worlds best athletes prepare to be drafted, broke 4.43. Merrits time this past weekend is INSANE and people can't recognize it because every running back at every high school now runs a "4.3" or "4.4". I don't care what Sonny Ship says, I'll take my years of experience of strength, speed and conditioning athletes over what he thinks.

Just an anecdote to show where part of the problem lies. An athlete I worked with went to an LSU camp a couple summers ago and ran a "4.5". He signs with LSU and shows up to summer workouts the next year in the best shape of his life. He had worked his butt off and was ready to fly. He runs a 4.7 at their team camp. Did he get slower in the course of a year? No, he just wasn't told his correct time the first time around. This leads to kids thinking they are much faster than they really are.

As as side note, the vertical jump mat that kids are using these days are very easy to manipulate. You can add 5+ inches to your vertical just knowing how to land. When you test those kids on a stationary vertical jump tester, they don't jump nearly as high.
Posted by jturn17
Member since Jan 2011
4978 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 11:43 am to
I can't agree with this more. People do not realize how fast 4.6 is for a high school kid.
Posted by TigerAlum93
Member since Sep 2010
3004 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

People are used to hearing lies so often about what the actual times are, in addition to the fact that athletes, coaches and parents are unaware that you have to add .24 seconds to hand time to convert to fully automatic timing to get an accurate mark.


Great post GhostofJackson!

I would like to clarify that the 0.24 correction is a rule of thumb that is usually applied to track, as that is the estimated time difference due to the electronic start from the gun, to the electronic finish.

At the NFL combine and other laser/electronic events, they are going on "first movement" and not having to react to a sound or stimulus. That is why you see a smaller correction (about 0.1 seconds) bewteen their hand times and "official" times.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
6602 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:27 pm to
I understand that the .24 is for the track, but I often find that it is about the same for hand timed 40s because they are often timed wrong for various reasons. I think it's because people don't time from hand motion and stop when the shoulders lean into the finish, not the torso.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81262 posts
Posted on 3/3/14 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

There were over a 1,000 listed participants at the event. You think the absolute fastest person in that large group could only run a 4.43?


Yes. They are in high school.


quote:

Even Sonny Shipp said it was a slow surface. He goes to several of these events and tracks performances every year.


He also said wink wink on speedy noil about 1000 times.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram