Started By
Message

re: OT potheads, what's your opinion of "wax?"

Posted on 2/27/14 at 10:00 am to
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
56597 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Obviously it affects people differently, and its possible that people that have an onset of psychosis due to marijuana are predisposed to it, but people preaching weed has no negative side effects should be taken out back and executed.
You sound like a real fun guy.

quote:

Its not the 60s. THC levels have skyrocketed because thats what gets you high, but CBD levels have remained the same
What? Like Breesus said, no chemical alteration is taking place. It's just a concentrated version of what already exists.
Posted by Hopeful Doc
Member since Sep 2010
15049 posts
Posted on 2/27/14 at 10:05 am to
quote:

It's just a concentrated version of what already exists


1) no one can actually state whether that's true or not (minor alterations in chemical balance can cause major changes)

2) concentrated and taken in lower amounts= not necessarily bad
Concentrated and taken in same amounts = much more likely to be bad- ex: I can drink a gallon of beer and be drunk. I probably could not drink a gallon of vodka and be well off. Same idea, if you have a smaller amount because it's more highly concentrated (again, assuming ratios all left untouched), then there's not much real concern. But doing the same amount at higher concentrations is, currently, neither proven to be good not bad, though more likely to have negative side effects.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram