Started By
Message

re: Ruger P95 or Ruger LC9?

Posted on 2/10/14 at 10:48 am to
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11913 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 10:48 am to
quote:

I was planning to see the LC9 and get a S&W M&P 9.




You're all over the place in regards to size.

The P95 and S&W M&P9 are both considered "full size" or "mid size" meaning they have a 4"-5" barrel and a full grip, both with a double stack magazine. While these are good home defense guns and some people carry them, the majority of people in regular clothing aren't fans of carrying full sized, double stack pistols.

If you want to stick with something that can be potentially carried and have the potential to act as a full sized pistol, I would check out the "compact" size, which simply means the slide and frame are both shorter. It will still be as wide as its full size partner since the magazine is still double stack, but the shorter dimensions make it slightly easier to conceal.

Then you have the "sub compact" size which can be seen as anything with a 3" barrel. I don't really consider double stack "sub compact" pistols, like the XD subcompact, as sub compacts. I would consider a sub compact to be a single stack pistol. This thinner dimension makes carrying the gun much easier. So the LC9 fits in this category.

You need to decide what size you are leaning and then make a choice from there. But I am also a huge fan of the M&P platform. It's one of my favorites.

Posted by Fetch78
The Woodlands, Tx
Member since Dec 2010
412 posts
Posted on 2/10/14 at 10:59 am to
Sorry I wasn't clear. I was referring to the Shield.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram