- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Final Fantasy 7.
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:41 am to Freauxzen
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:41 am to Freauxzen
quote:
And I liked that take on it (Final Fantasy VI came close to the Urban feel, it was very much rooted in a pseudo-steampunk world), but they just never let it go outside of 9. And everything had to be some "alternate modernity," or something close to it.
Concur - with 6 we saw signs of transition from purely medieval themes, but the graphic technology limitations at the time couldn't really display the theme as powerfully. FF7 seemed open the floodgates and was a great launching point to expand the genre (Xenogears and such followed shortly thereafter).
Speaking of remakes, I don't see how/why SquareEnix wouldn't want to modernize a lot of the past classics. It's guaranteed gold. I want to be a purist and all, but how could anyone turn down a classic reboots like FF6 or Trigger?
This post was edited on 2/4/14 at 11:47 am
1
Posted on 2/4/14 at 11:56 am to Billy Mays
Square said recently that a FF7 remake was not going to happen. Unless, one of the new final fantasies can outsell 7, which I don't see happening any time soon. Square is probably terrified of doing a remake, knowing that if they frick it up it will probably be the end of the company. I for one would like a remake of IV (III) or Chrono Trigger before 7.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News