Started By
Message

Does it make sense to add a nice upper to a Stag lower?

Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:27 pm
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:27 pm
Basic info is I have a Stag Model 2 complete rifle with a cheap quad rail. It's a carbine length gun, and to be a real Operator I think I need a mid-length upper.

It would be great to just buy a new complete DD, BCM, etc rifle, but that's not happening.

Is it worth just switching out the upper? I want a more accurate, more controllable rifle with a better (lighter) rail system. I also want to have a decent brand name on my upper if I ever take a carbine class.

I realize the lower is not up to the standards of the brands mentioned above, but how big of a difference does that make?

Budget ~ $800


Posted by DirtyMikeandtheBoys
Member since May 2011
19429 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:30 pm to
I am in the middle of my first build so take this FWIW, but

The lower is just a machined block of steel. Any lower is pretty comparable. Now the upper and the LPK are where things get better or worse with $.

I put a BCM SOCOM carbine on a PSA lower, fwiw.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
43678 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:32 pm to
I wouldnt think that the lower would make much of a difference outside of the trigger group.
Posted by brass2mouth
NOLA
Member since Jul 2007
19715 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:37 pm to
The lower in all honesty just gives you resellablity (that a word?) and the "ooh lookey" factor at the range.

As long as your lower is milspec youre GTG.


ETA:
quote:


and to be a real Operator I think I need a mid-length upper


WTFF?
This post was edited on 2/3/14 at 2:39 pm
Posted by LloydChristmas
in a van down by the river
Member since Nov 2009
2829 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 2:43 pm to
all the acronyms in this thread are making my head hurt
Posted by bayoudude
Member since Dec 2007
24966 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 4:05 pm to
I may be in the minority but i like to have matching name brands on the upper/lower. I know it makes no real difference but it may help resale if that is something you may consider in the future. Also the finishes may be slightly different from one manufacturer to the other. I do have a delton upper on a cmmg lower and it appears to be the same finish. That said when i build my .300blk i will probably get a cmmg upper to match to my already built lower and put the upper on it now on a different lower.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16639 posts
Posted on 2/3/14 at 8:48 pm to
quote:

I realize the lower is not up to the standards of the brands mentioned above, but how big of a difference does that make?


What makes you think their lowers are functionally any better than Stag's? They cost more? They're "billet"?
Posted by burgeman
Member since Jun 2008
10365 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 6:32 pm to
Here is a good thread that popped up today about stag, like others have said it is not a terrible option but there are better options out there.

LINK
Posted by bulldog95
North Louisiana
Member since Jan 2011
20728 posts
Posted on 2/4/14 at 6:40 pm to
Lowers are all basically the same except

Forged
Bullet
Removable trigger guard
Fixed trigger guard
Roll marks
Fire selection markings


Now bolt carrier groups, barrels, uppers, charging handles, rails, etc....... Are a different story with lots of selections.


FWIW: I have several lowers and unless I'm pairing up a specific lower with its upper like spikes with spikes I don't really worry about it.


I will be using my custom shadow ops weaponry lower for a .300
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram