With USC's hire, does UF rethink its loyalty to Muschamp?

UF is a great program which has no business going 4-8 and having an offense which is completely devoid of talent in the offensive skill positions. Muschamp was avg. in year one, may have had the worst 11-1 team in the history of CFB in year two(they seemingly caught every break last year), and took a team that everyone knew wouldn't come close to last year's success to an unthinkable 4-8 that included a home loss to an FCS school. Couple that with the fact that (while improved) his on-field demeanor has been ridiculous. At times he looked like he was about to have a stroke or punch a referee, player, coach on the first drive of the game! When he wasn't doing that, he was challenging the fans. Hell, you could argue that Zook was a better coach, and he only lasted 3 years.

Despite all of that, I figured UF would hold on to Muschamp for one more year because they didn't want to be involved in a search and bidding war that included Texas and USC (arguably the only two jobs better than UF). Hold out for one more year, and UF would almost assuredly be the top available job in the country. However, now that USC appears to have made a questionable hire at best, does UF get in the mix?